F-Mediated Conjugation, F+ Strains, andHfr Strains of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella abony
Chapter
128
KENNETH E. SANDERSON
Some wild-type lines of Salmonella spp. contain plasmids which are self-transmissible by conjugation (25). However, most such plasmids have very low frequencies of self-transmission owing to repression of transfer functions; this situation has been extensively analyzed by Datta et al. (6). In addition, most plasmids give infrequent chromosome mobilization because of the low frequency of plasmid-chromosome recombination. A system for chromosome mobilization was established by Smith et al. (40) for Salmonella typhimurium (official designation, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium) by using colicin factors. The system was based on their observation that conjugative colicin factors newly transmitted to a cell are transiently derepressed and give very high frequencies of subsequent transfer to recipient cells. This system of Col-factor-mediated conjugation (called HFC) used ColI and ColE1 factors and gave recombination frequencies of up to 1/106 cells tested; this allowed the construction of a partial linkage map of S. typhimurium (41). Stably derepressed colicin factors have subsequently been isolated (25), and some stable insertions of colicin factors into the chromosome of Escherichia coli have been obtained.
However, the majority of genetic analysis by conjugation in both E. coli K-12 and S. typhimurium has been done using the F factor from E. coli K-12. This plasmid is well suited for genetic analysis because it is derepressed for F function and because homologous recombination between the plasmid and the chromosome gives rise to Hfr strains with the plasmid stably inserted in the chromosome.
The F factor of E. coli K-12 was transferred from E. coli to S. typhimurium LT2 by Zinder (51) and to Salmonella abony by Mäkelä et al. (23). Hfr strains of S. typhimurium (30, 35, 37, 51) and S. abony (22) were isolated. These strains of Salmonella are not hybrids between E. coli and Salmonella spp. for chromosomal genes; they carry the F factor from E. coli, but all the data indicate that they carry no chromosomal genes from E. coli.
Merodiploids are common among the progeny of S. typhimurium-E. coli intergeneric crosses. This merodiploidy is usually maintained through F' factors, but in some cases, the extra DNA is inserted into the recipient chromosome (15, 16, 19, 29). Merodiploids of these types are not considered in this report.
The F factor of E. coli K-12 is a conjugative plasmid which determines the presence of F pili, conjugal transfer of F and the chromosome, surface exclusion of the entry of related plasmids, incompatibility of related plasmids, and inhibition of the replication of certain female-specific phages (for reviews, see references 10, 13, and 49 and chapter 126 in this volume). In most F-like plasmids, the tra gene is negatively regulated by the finO and finP gene products (fin for fertility inhibition). Mullineaux and Willetts (26) speculate that a complex of finP RNA and the FinO protein, when both are present, can interact with the leader portion of the traJ transcript to prevent its transcription and/or translation. However, the F factor shows no fertility inhibition, because the finO gene is inactivated by insertion of an IS3 element (50). Since F function in E. coli is not repressed, up to 100% of cells have F pili, participate in conjugation, and adsorb male-specific bacteriophages. Numerous other plasmids determining sex pili and conjugal transfer have these functions repressed, and only a small fraction of the cells (from 10–1 to 10–4) have pili and can transfer plasmid or chromosome (6). In some cases, these other plasmids also inhibit F fertility (i.e., they are Fin+); some others do not (these are called Fin–) (6). Gasson and Willetts (11) described five systems inhibiting F function; one of these, the FinOP system, is responsible for the often poor expression of F fertility functions in many commonly used S. typhimurium lines. This system requires three genes: finO, the trans-acting product of which acts on many different plasmids; finP, which makes a plasmid-specific trans-acting product; and traO.
When F was transmitted into strains of Salmonella, the fertility of the resulting F+ lines was usually much less than that of F in E. coli K-12, and the cultures did not show visible lysis by male-specific phage M13 or f2 when tested on solid media (23, 35, 51). Cells of S. typhimurium LT2 carrying the F' factor Flac + had repressed F function (Fin+), since only 0.001 to 0.007 Lac+ transconjugant was formed per donor cell and only 0.02% to 0.05% of the cells formed plaque-forming centers with the male-specific phage f2 (34). In addition, phage f2 was propagated to only a low titer (about 106 to 107 PFU ml). The lack of visible lysis of these strains on agar plates by the male-specific phages f2 and M13 is a rapid and accurate test for the Fin+ phenotype in strains known to be carrying F (Fin– cells carrying F show visible lysis by these phages). This fertility inhibition is due to a 90-kb plasmid present in strain LT2 and many other S. typhimurium strains and referred to as the virulence plasmid, or pSLT (34, 39, 45). pSLT is stably replicated, and spontaneous curing occurs at a very low rate (45). pSLT is not self-transmissible, but it is mobilizable by plasmids such as F. Over half of the lines of S. typhimurium independently isolated from nature have a Fin+ plasmid resembling pSLT (2). The Fin+ property of pSLT is due to the FinOP fertility inhibition system (11).
F-derepressed (Fin–) strains of S. typhimurium have been isolated, and the following evidence indicates that they are now as fertile as E. coli K-12 F+ lines: in crosses of S. typhimurium Flac + Fin– donors with S. typhimurium recipients, the yield was ca. 1.0 Lac+ transconjugant per donor cell; there was close to 1.0 f2 infective center per donor cell; male-specific phages f2 and M13 were multiplied to titers of >1010 PFU ml and gave visible lysis of these strains on agar; and almost 100% of cells had F pili which adsorbed f2 (34, 38).
There are four separate sources of F-factor-derepressed (Fin–) strains in S. typhimurium; these are available from the Salmonella Genetic Stock Centre. The first is F42 lac+ plasmids with finP or traO mutations, which were described by Finnegan and Willetts(9). F42 finP301 lac + was transferred by conjugation to S. typhimurium with selection for the Lac+ phenotype (all Salmonella spp. are naturally Lac–) to yield strain SA2197 [purC7(F42 finP301 lac+)]. Although strain SA2197 still carries pSLT, as do nearly all S. typhimurium LT2 strains, its phenotype is Fin– (33). Second, Fin– strains may be obtained by using normal F factors in strains of S. typhimurium which have been cured for pSLT; these lines are rare. One such cured line was obtained from H. J. Whitfield (24). Other cured lines have been isolated by M. F. Edwards (Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 1985), who has developed a general method of removing pSLT, as follows. A selectable tetracycline resistance marker is inserted into pSLT by using P22 phage to transduce Tn10 from a line bearing a known Tn10 insertion in pSLT. The cells are then treated with novobiocin to promote curing of pSLT. Strains which have lost the plasmid are selected by growing the cells in media (3) which inhibit the growth of tetracycline-resistant cells.
The third means of constructing Fin– strains uses pKZ1, a plasmid identified by Smith et al. (39) as carrying the kanamycin resistance gene. pKZ1 is in the same Inc group as pSLT but is itself Fin–, and although it is nonconjugative, it is efficiently mobilized by F. The pKZ1-carrying transconjugants are easily selected by kanamycin resistance, and pSLT is expelled from pKZ1+ cells by incompatibility (34). A fourth source of Fin– strains is a set of S. typhimurium F+ and Hfr strains previously reported (35) and summarized here in Table 1. The F+ strain SR297 (Table 1) and Hfr strains isolated by Zinder (51) are Fin+ (SR305 and SR315), but F+ strains derived from transfer of this F to other S. typhimurium lines (Table 1) are insensitive to repression by pSLT, probably owing to mutations in either finP or traO. The isolation of these Fin– strains occurred after the maintenance of F in strain SR297 and its transfer to produce new F+ lines. The mechanism is probably as follows. Maintenance of F in a culture during growth involves spontaneous curing and reinfection; a derepressed F in a line of S. typhimurium carrying pSLT would have a greatly increased transfer frequency. Therefore, it is not surprising that derepressed mutants seem to achieve high frequency in the population and are isolatable without overt selection.
Table 1F+ and Hfr strains of Salmonella |
The composition of the cell envelope is important in determining the ability of a cell to act as a recipient in conjugation with a cell carrying either an F plasmid (ConF function) or an I plasmid (ConI function). All ompA mutants of E. coli (affected in the outer membrane protein OmpA) were inefficient recipients in matings with F-carrying strains (ConF–) when the mating was done in liquid medium but were close to normal for ConF function when the mating was done on membrane filters (1). Similarly, ompA mutants of S. typhimurium are ineffective as recipients in F-mediated conjugation in liquid medium (33). Thus, the OmpA protein is necessary for stabilization of the mating aggregates but does not appear to be the sole receptor for the F pilus.
Since strains of E. coli (12, 28) and S. typhimurium (33, 47) with heptose-deficient lipopolysaccharide are also ConF–, components of the lipopolysaccharide are also required for efficient conjugation. The most efficient S. typhimurium recipients are those having a complete or nearly complete core region without any O (somatic) side chains. The lipopolysaccharide compositions of these efficient recipients resemble that of E. coli K-12, all strains of which lack the O (somatic) side chain (43) found on wild-type E. coli and Salmonella lines.
Although core lipopolysaccharide is required for efficient recipient capacity in conjugation, the O (somatic) side chains of the lipopolysaccharide reduce the frequency of conjugation (14, 47). In crosses of S. typhimurium F finP301 lac + to F– strains of S. typhimurium in which the cells were mated in broth, recipient strains which were rough mutants affected in the outer core region of the lipopolysaccharide gave ca. 1.0 Lac+ recombinant per donor cell; smooth strains (with O side chains on the lipopolysaccharide) gave about 1/20 as many Lac+ recombinants per donor cell (33). However, when strains were mated on membrane filters, both smooth and rough strains gave equally efficient levels of transfer (i.e., ca. 1.0 Lac+ transconjugant per donor cell). Reduced fertility of smooth recipients may occur because the O side chains of the lipopolysaccharide shield the conjugation receptor and reduce the efficiency of stabilization of mating aggregates, since gradient-of-transmission experiments indicated that once mating aggregates are formed, they are equally stable in both smooth and rough recipients. Jarolmen and Kemp (14) and Watanabe et al. (47) also noted that F+ transconjugants in a smooth recipient strain are frequently rough mutants. We also observed that many of the F+ strains isolated upon transfer of F to smooth strains of S. typhimurium were rough mutants (Table 1). This result may be due to the increased efficiency of transfer to the rare spontaneous rough mutants present in the population of smooth recipient cells.
Intergeneric plasmid exchange is affected by host-mediated restriction-modification systems. Transfer of Flac + from S. typhimurium LT2 to E. coli K-12 is much more frequent than the reverse. The frequency of Flac + transfer from a derepressed F finP301 lac + S. typhimurium line to a rough S. typhimurium recipient was ca. 1.0 Lac+ transconjugant per donor cell, and transfer to an E. coli K-12 F– line (C600) was almost as high (0.46 Lac+ transconjugant per donor cell) (33). However, whereas Flac + E. coli K-12 lines were very fertile in crosses to E. coli recipients (as expected), crosses from E. coli to smooth S. typhimurium recipient strains with wild-type host restriction genes gave only 1.6 × 10–5 Lac+ transconjugants per donor cell. Rough recipient strains gave 10 to 14 times as many Lac+ transconjugants as smooth strains (about the same increase as seen in crosses within Salmonella spp.), and strains with host restriction mutations hsdL and hsdSA gave ca. 100 times as many transconjugants as did strains with the wild-type genes. Thus, the S. typhimurium F– strain SL1655, which has mutations in hsdL hsdSA (for host restriction) and rfaG (for lipopolysaccharide synthesis), gave 0.037 Lac+ transconjugant per donor cell in crosses with E. coli when mating was in broth and 0.11 Lac+ transconjugant when mating was on membrane filters. Recipient strains with a mutation in the host restriction gene hsdSB as well as in hsdL and hsdSA have been isolated by Bullas and Ryu (4), and these strains (e.g., LB5000 and LB5010) are very effective recipients for conjugation from E. coli. Some of these strains also carry a galE (galactose epimerase) mutation that gives rough lipopolysaccharide, which enhances the frequency of transformation of plasmid DNA (21), and they are very efficient recipients of transforming plasmid DNA isolated from either Salmonella spp. or E. coli. Thus, they are very useful in manipulations with recombinant DNA.
The frequency of transconjugants in crosses of E. coli Hfr strains with S. typhimurium F– when selection is for chromosomal genes from the donor strains is usually very low (8). This is because of the barriers to conjugation described above, which are due to O (somatic) side chains on the lipopolysaccharide and to host restriction, and also because recombination between the nonhomologous chromosomes of the two genera to give rise to stable transconjugants occurs at very low frequency. Many of the recombinants for chromosomal genes are due to recombination at duplicated and highly conserved genes such as rrn (19). The frequency of recombinants due to homologous recombination in crosses of E. coli Hfr into S. typhimurium F– was increased from 10–8 to 10–4 by using mutH, mutS, or mutL mutations in the S. typhimurium F– strain; this suggests that the mismatch error repair system prevents recombination between DNA with substantial divergence but that when the system is missing, homologous recombination is much more tolerant of divergence (27).
The F factor of E. coli K-12 was transmitted into S. typhimurium to produce SR297 F+, and strain SR305 (HfrA) was isolated from this line (Table 1) (51). However, strain SR297 F+ is not a good source of different Hfr strains because it produces Hfr strains almost all of which are the HfrA type (Table 1, Fig. 1) (35). As a result, strain SR297 was postulated to contain a sex factor affinity region (sfa) on the chromosome at the site of the origin of chromosome transfer in HfrA (35). To provide a wider range of Hfr strains, F was transmitted from SR297 into a number of other lines of S. typhimurium LT2. Those F+ strains from which Hfr strains were isolated are listed in Table 1.
The F factor was similarly transmitted from E. coli K-12 into an S. abony strain to produce the auxotroph SW1363 F+ and the prototroph SW803 F+ (22, 23), and Hfr strains were isolated from both of these. The Hfr strains of S. typhimurium and S. abony listed in Table 1 were isolated as described by Sanderson et al. (35). The points of origin of the Hfr strains are illustrated in the partial linkage map in Fig. 1, with S. typhimurium strains outside the circle and S. abony strains inside the circle. The data from which the points of origin were derived were presented by Sanderson et al. (35) or are, in some cases, discussed in the footnotes to Table 1.
Although many Hfr strains are available, mapping by conjugation may be limited by lack of a donor with a convenient point of origin and orientation of transfer. Chumley et al. (5) developed a system using the transposable drug resistance element Tn10 (17) that permits the isolation of an Hfr strain with an origin at any site of the chromosome at which a Tn10 insertion has been isolated. This system also permits selection of the direction of chromosome transfer. This method requires the directed insertion of an F' ts114 lac + plasmid into the chromosome by homologous recombination between a Tn10 sequence carried on the plasmid and a second Tn10 sequence located on the chromosome.
Wild-type S. typhimurium lacks the genes for the utilization of lactose, but it is Lac+ when it harbors a plasmid carrying the lac operon of E. coli. F' ts114 lac + is temperature sensitive for replication and is lost during growth at 42°C. When Lac+ survivors are selected at 42°C, the most common class results from integration of the F' ts114 lac + plasmid into the chromosome (5).
Derivatives of F' ts114 lac + that carry a Tn10 insertion in the F-derived part of the plasmid in the two possible orientations were constructed. When S. typhimurium strains with a Tn10 insertion in the chromosome and carrying the plasmids described above were grown at 42°C and Lac+ colonies were selected, Hfr formation occurred by homologous, recA-dependent recombination between plasmid-borne and chromosomal Tn10 elements. All Hfr strains isolated from a given merodiploid showed the same direction of transfer. Depending on the orientation of Tn10 in the F' plasmid, Hfr strains transferring in either orientation could be obtained for any chromosomal Tn10 insertion.
Hfr strains generated by this method are sufficiently stable for genetic mapping crosses if they are used shortly after isolation. However, they have proven to be rather unstable during storage and thus are difficult to maintain. Most investigators reisolate the desired Hfr strain rather than attempting to maintain it. Reisolation is easily done by maintaining the donor in the F' form in a –70°C freezer. When the Hfr form is required, the freezer stock can then be streaked to minimal medium containing lactose and grown at 42°C. The large, fast-growing colonies are then picked for immediate use in crosses (J. R. Roth, personal communication).
One important use of Tn10-directed Hfr strains has been to locate unmapped Tn10 insertions with respect to other markers. Lac+ Hfr insertions are selected in a strain with a chromosomal Tn10 insertion and either F' ts114 lac + zzf-20::Tn10 (in one orientation) or F' ts114 lac + zzf-21::Tn10 (in the opposite orientation); the F' elements with Tn10 in the opposite orientation yield Hfr strains with an opposite direction of transfer. The determination of frequency of formation of transconjugants with various mutant genes shows the position of the point of origin of transfer and thus the location of the Tn10 insertion (5). If Tn10 is inserted into a gene, thus resulting in an altered phenotype, the position of the gene is determined.
Strains of S. typhimurium with Tn10 (or Tn5) insertions at many different sites on the chromosome are listed by Sanderson and Roth (36) and are available from the original investigator or the Salmonella Genetic Stock Centre at the University of Calgary. For a detailed list, see chapter 141 in this volume. In conjunction with the zzf-20 and zzf-21 Tn10 insertions in F, these chromosomal Tn10 insertions have been used to map any known gene as either clockwise or counterclockwise from a known point of insertion (e.g., see reference 42).
A small number of F' strains carrying segments of the chromosome of S. typhimurium along with the F factor have been reported (e.g., F' trp-cysB-pyrF [31] and F' his [46]). My own efforts to isolate F' strains have frequently been unsuccessful. Formation of F' strains is normally due to homologous recombination at insertion sequences in an Hfr strain (44). S. typhimurium LT2 lacks many of the insertion sequences present in E. coli; it has six copies of IS200 (18). This lack may explain the small number of F' strains isolated.
Hfr strains isolated by the methods of Chumley et al. (5) have been used to isolate F' strains (J. A. Pogliano and S. R. Maloy, unpublished data). First, S. typhimurium Hfr strains were constructed by selecting for recombination between Tn10 insertions in opposite orientations on a temperature-sensitive F' and a chromosomal melB::Tn10 insertion (5). F' derivatives were selected by mating the Hfr strains with S. typhimurium metA recA F–, with selection for Met+ transconjugants. Hfr strains oriented in one direction gave no F' strains, but those oriented in the other direction yielded F' strains carrying the genes ace +, iclR +, and metA +; these F' strains were used in complementation studies (Pogliano and Maloy, unpublished data).
A set of F' strains carrying all parts of the chromosome of E. coli is available (20). Many of these strains have been transferred into S. typhimurium (32) and are available from the Salmonella Genetic Stock Centre.
The Salmonella Genetic Stock Centre is supported by an infrastructure grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Research is supported by an operating grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and by grant R01AI34829 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
References
1. Achtman, M., S. Schwuchow, G. Helmunth, G. Morelli, and P. A. Manning. 1978. Cell-cell interactions in conjugating Escherichia coli: con– mutants and stabilization of mating aggregates. Mol. Gen. Genet. 164:171–183.
2. Anderson, E. S., and H. R. Smith. 1972. Fertility inhibition in strains of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Gen. Genet. 118:79–84.
3. Bochner, B. R., H.-C. Huang, G. L. Schieven, and B. N. Ames. 1980. Positive selection for loss of tetracycline resistance. J. Bacteriol. 143:926–933.
4. Bullas, L. R., and J.-I. Ryu. 1983. Salmonella typhimurium LT2 strains which are r–m+ for all three chromosomally located systems of DNA restriction and modification. J. Bacteriol. 156:471–474.
5. Chumley, F. G., R. Menzel, and J. R. Roth. 1979. Hfr formation directed by Tn10. Genetics 91:639–655.
6. Datta, N., A. M. Lawn, and E. Meynell. 1966. The relationship of F-type piliation and F-phage sensitivity to drug resistance transfer in R+F–Escherichia coli K-12. J. Gen. Microbiol. 45:365–376.
7. Demerec, M., E. Adelberg, A. Clark, and P. Hartman. 1966. A proposal for a uniform nomenclature in bacterial genetics. Genetics 54:61–76.
8. Demerec, M., and N. Ohta. 1964. Genetic analysis of Salmonella typhimurium ×Escherichia coli hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 52:317–323.
9. Finnegan, D. J., and N. S. Willetts. 1971. Two classes of Flac mutants insensitive to transfer inhibition by an F-like R-factor. Mol. Gen. Genet. 111:256–264.
10. Frost, L. S., K. Ippen-Ihler, and R. A. Skurray. 1994. Analysis of the sequence and gene products of the transfer region of the F sex factor. Microbiol. Rev. 58:162–210.
11. Gasson, M. J., and N. S. Willetts. 1975. Five control systems preventing transfer of Escherichia coli K-12 sex factor F. J. Bacteriol. 122:518–525.
12. Havekes, L. M., B. J. J. Lugtenberg, and W. P. M. Hoekstra. 1976. Conjugation deficient Escherichia coli K-12 F– mutants with heptoseless lipopolysaccharide. Mol. Gen. Genet. 146:43–50.
13. Ippen-Ihler, K., and S. Maneewannakul. 1991. Conjugation among enteric bacteria: mating systems dependent upon pili, p. 37–69. In M. Dworkin (ed.), Microbial Cell-Cell Interactions. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.
14. Jarolmen, H., and G. Kemp. 1969. Association of increased recipient ability for R factors and reduced virulence among variants of Salmonella choleraesuis var. kunzendorf. J. Bacteriol. 97:962–963.
15. Johnson, E. M., W. G. Craig, Jr., J. A. Wohlhieter, J. R. Lazere, R. M Synenki, and L. S. Baron. 1973. Conservation of Salmonella typhimurium deoxyribonucleic acid in partially diploid hybrids of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 115:629–634.
16. Johnson, E. M., P. B. Placek, N. J. Snellings, and L. S. Baron. 1975. Conservation of Salmonella typhimurium deoxyribonucleic acid by chromosomal insertion in a partially diploid Escherichia coli hybrid. J. Bacteriol. 123:1–6.
17. Kleckner, N., J. R. Roth, and D. Botstein. 1977. Genetic engineering in vivo using translocatable drug-resistance elements. New methods in bacterial genetics. J. Mol. Biol. 116:125–159.
18. Lam, S., and J. R. Roth. 1983. Genetic mapping of IS200 copies in Salmonella typhimurium LT2. Genetics 105:801–811.
19. Lehner, A. F., and C. W. Hill. 1985. Merodiploidy in Escherichia coli-Salmonella typhimurium crosses: the role of unequal recombination between ribosomal RNA genes. Genetics 110:365–380.
20. Low, B. 1972. Escherichia coli K-12 F-prime factors: old and new. Bacteriol. Rev. 36:587–607.
21. MacLachlan, P. R., and K. E. Sanderson. 1985. Transformation of Salmonella typhimurium with plasmid DNA: difference between rough and smooth strains. J. Bacteriol. 161:442–445.
22. Mäkelä, P. H. 1963. Hfr males in Salmonella abony. Genetics 48:423–429.
23. Mäkelä, P. H., J. Lederberg, and E. M. Lederberg. 1962. Patterns of sexual recombination in enteric bacteria. Genetics 47:1427–1439.
24. Manis, J. J., and H. J. Whitfield. 1977. Physical characterization of a plasmid cointegrate containing an F'his gnd element and the Salmonella typhimurium LT2 cryptic plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 129:1601–1606.
25. Meynell, E., G. G. Meynell, and N. Datta. 1968. Phylogenetic relationships of drug resistance factors and other transmissible bacterial plasmids. Bacteriol. Rev. 35:55–83.
26. Mullineaux, P., and N. Willetts. 1985. Promoters in the transfer region of plasmid F, p. 605–614. In D. R. Helinski, S. N. Cohen, D. B. Clewell, D. A. Jackson, and A. Hollaender (ed.), Plasmids in Bacteria. Plenum Press, New York.
27. Rayssiguier, C., D. S. Thaler, and M. Radman. 1989. The barrier to cocombination between Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium is disrupted in mismatch-repair mutants. Nature (London) 342:396–401.
28. Reiner, A. M. 1974. Escherichia coli females defective in conjugation and in absorption of a single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid phage. J. Bacteriol. 119:183–191.
29. Sanderson, K. E. 1976. Genetic relatedness in the family Enterobacteriaceae. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 30:327–349.
30. Sanderson, K. E., and M. Demerec. 1965. The linkage map of Salmonella typhimurium. Genetics 51:897–913.
31. Sanderson, K. E., and C. A. Hall. 1970. F-prime factors of Salmonella typhimurium and an inversion between S. typhimurium and Escherichia coli. Genetics 64:215–228.
32. Sanderson, K. E., and P. E. Hartman. 1978. Linkage map of Salmonella typhimurium, edition V. Microbiol. Rev. 42:471–519.
33. Sanderson, K. E., J. Janzer, and J. Head. 1981. Influence of lipopolysaccharide and protein in the cell envelope on recipient capacity in conjugation of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 148:283–293.
34. Sanderson, K. E., S. K. Kadam, and P. R. MacLachlan. 1983. Derepression of F factor function in Salmonella typhimurium. Can. J. Microbiol. 29:1205–1212.
35. Sanderson, K. E., H. Ross, L. Ziegler, and P. H. Mäkelä. 1972. F+, Hfr, and F' strains of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella abony. Bacteriol. Rev. 36:608–637.
36. Sanderson, K. E., and J. R. Roth. 1988. Linkage map of Salmonella typhimurium, edition VII. Microbiol. Rev. 52:485–532.
37. Sanderson, K. E., and H. Saeed. 1972. Insertion of the F factor into the cluster of rfa (rough A) genes of Salmonella typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 112:64–73.
38. Sanderson, K. E., and B. A. D. Stocker. 1981. Gene rfaH, which affects lipopolysaccharide core structure in Salmonella typhimurium, is required also for expression of F-factor functions. J. Bacteriol. 146:535–541.
39. Smith, H. R., G. O. Humphreys, N. D. F. Grindley, J. N. Grindley, and E. S. Anderson. 1973. Molecular studies of a fi+ plasmid from strains of Salmonella typhimurium LT2. Mol. Gen. Genet. 126:143–151.
40. Smith, S. M., H. Ozeki, and B. A. D. Stocker. 1963. Transfer of colE1 and colE2 during high-frequency transmission of colI in Salmonella typhimurium. J. Gen. Microbiol. 33:231–242.
41. Smith, S. M., and B. A. D. Stocker. 1962. Colicinogeny and recombination. Br. Med. Bull. 18:46–51.
42. Somers, J. M., G. D. Sweet, and W. W. Kay. 1981. Fluorocitrate resistant tricarboxylate transport mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Gen. Genet. 181:338–345.
43. Tamaki, S., T. Sato, and M. Matsuhashi. 1971. Role of lipopolysaccharides in antibiotic resistance and bacteriophage adsorption of Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 105:968–975.
44. Timmons, M. S., A. M. Bogardus, and R. D. Deonier. 1983. Mapping of chromosomal IS5 elements that mediate type II F-prime plasmid excision in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 153:395–407.
45. Tinge, S. A., and R. Curtiss III. 1990. Isolation of the replication and partitioning regions of the Salmonella typhimurium virulence plasmid and stabilization of heterologous replicons. J. Bacteriol. 172:5266–5277.
46. Voll, M. J. 1972. Derivation of an F-merogenote and a phi80 high-frequency transducing phage carrying the histidine operon of Salmonella. J. Bacteriol. 109:741–750.
47. Watanabe, T., T. Arai, and T. Hottori. 1970. Effects of cell wall polysaccharide on the motive ability of Salmonella typhimurium. Nature (London) 225:70–71.
48. Wilkinson, R. G., P. Gemski, Jr., and B. A. D. Stocker. 1972. Non-smooth mutants of Salmonella typhimurium: differentiation by phage sensitivity and genetic mapping. J. Gen. Microbiol. 70:527–554.
49. Willetts, N., and B. Wilkens. 1984. Processing of plasmid DNA during bacterial conjugation. Microbiol. Rev. 48:24–41.
50. Yoshioka, Y., H. Ohtsubo, and E. Ohtsubo. 1987. Repressor gene finO in plasmids R100 and F: constitutive transfer of plasmid F is caused by insertion of IS3 into F finO. J. Bacteriol. 169:619–623.
51. Zinder, N. D. 1960. Sexuality and mating in Salmonella. Science 131:924–926.