Folate Biosynthesis, Reduction, and Polyglutamylation and the Interconversion of Folate Derivatives
JACALYN M. GREEN1 AND ROWENA G. MATTHEWS2*
[SECTION EDITOR: AUGUST BÖCK]
Posted March 21, 2007
Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL 60515,1 and Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-22162
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Room 4002 Life Sciences Institute, 210 Washtenaw Avenue, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2216. Phone: (734) 764-9459, Fax: (734) 763-6492, E-mail:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
In contrast to humans, for whom folate is a dietary requirement, many microorganisms and plants possess the ability to synthesize folic acid derivatives de novo, initially forming dihydrofolate. This folic acid derivative is not active in one-carbon transfer reactions and must first be reduced to the level of tetrahydrofolate, in which the N-5–C-6 and C-7–N-8 double bonds present in folic acid have been reduced (Fig. 1). All the folic acid derivatives that serve as recipients and donors of one-carbon units are derivatives of tetrahydrofolate, which is formed from dihydrofolate by an NADPH-dependent reduction catalyzed by dihydrofolate reductase (FolA). This chapter takes as its starting point the chapter on this topic that was published in the 1996 edition of Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology (chapter 41), with updates on developments since that time.
The product of de novo dihydrofolate biosynthesis is also a monoglutamate. However, the intracellular forms of folic acid are almost entirely polyglutamates, formed by the addition of two to seven glutamyl residues to the monoglutamate. In the derivative shown in Fig. 2, the bonds of the second and third glutamyl residues are to the γ-carboxyl group of the preceding glutamate, in contrast to peptide bonds where the linkage would be to the α-carboxyl group. During the exponential growth of Escherichia coli, the major folylpolyglutamates are triglutamates, with γ-linkages as shown in Fig. 2 (29). However, during stationary phase (29) or infection with T4 bacteriophage (69), polyglutamates with longer chains are formed. The polyglutamate tail is required for the intracellular retention of folic acid derivatives and plays an important role in the binding of folate cosubstrates to enzymes involved in one-carbon transfer or the interconversion of folic acid derivatives (75). Most folate-dependent enzymes will use both monoglutamate and polyglutamate forms of folic acid derivatives as substrates, but polyglutamate derivatives are usually better substrates, with lower Michaelis constants (Km values) and/or with higher maximum initial velocities (Vmax). However, the cobalamin-independent methionine synthase specified by the metE gene shows an absolute requirement for the polyglutamate form of its substrate methyltetrahydrofolate (110). Strains of E. coli with greatly reduced folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity are auxotrophic for methionine or vitamin B12 (vitamin B12 supplementation permits methionine synthesis using the cobalamin-dependent MetH protein that can use methyltetrahydrofolate monoglutamate as a substrate), and their growth is stimulated by the addition of glycine and thymine to the medium (11).
Tetrahydrofolate serves as a recipient for one-carbon units in various oxidation states that are attached to N-5 or N-10 or both. The major derivatives are illustrated in Fig. 3. 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate contains a methylene group bridging N-5 and N-10 and serves as the source of one-carbon units for the de novo biosynthesis of thymidylate from uridylate in the reaction catalyzed by thymidylate synthase (ThyA) as shown in Fig. 4. Methylenetetrahydrofolate also provides a one-carbon unit in the biosynthesis of pantothenate (102). This cofactor can be reversibly converted to 10-formyltetrahydrofolate, which is used to supply one-carbon units in the de novo biosynthesis of purines. Two enzymes, glycinamide ribonucleotide (GAR) transformylase and 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR) transformylase, use 10-formyltetrahydrofolate to introduce a carbon unit during the assembly of the purine ring. (There is also a glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase that uses formate rather than formyltetrahydrofolate as the source of one-carbon units [74].) Formyltetrahydrofolate is also the one-carbon-unit donor for the formylation of fMet-tRNAfMet. Methylenetetrahydrofolate can be reduced to form 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, which is used exclusively for the conversion of homocysteine to methionine in the terminal step of methionine biosynthesis.
Tetrahydrofolate serves as a recipient for one-carbon units generated during glycine cleavage to form a methylene group, CO2 and NH3 catalyzed by the glycine cleavage system (GcvT, H, and P and Lpd), and during the conversion of serine to glycine and a methylene group catalyzed by GlyA (serine hydroxymethyltransferase). In both cases, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate is formed. E. coli does not contain a formyltetrahydrofolate synthetase, preventing the utilization of formate as a source of tetrahydrofolate-bound one-carbon units.
Folate derivatives also participate in other cellular processes that do not involve one-carbon transfers. Methenyltetrahydrofolate, an intermediate in the conversion of methylenetetrahydrofolate to 10-formyltetrahydrofolate, plays a role in the repair of pyrimidine dimers by DNA photolyase (37). 7,8-Dihydrofolate hexaglutamate, derived from the reaction catalyzed by thymidylate synthase, is involved in the assembly of the baseplate of T4 phage.
In this chapter, we will discuss the biosynthesis of dihydrofolate monoglutamate, its reduction to tetrahydrofolate monoglutamate, and the addition of glutamyl residues to form folylpolyglutamates. E. coli and Salmonella, like many microorganisms that can synthesize folate de novo, appear to lack the ability to transport folate into the cell and are thus highly susceptible to inhibitors of folate biosynthesis. This chapter will include a brief discussion of the inhibition of folate biosynthesis by sulfa drugs.
The folate biosynthetic pathway can be divided into two sections that will guide the organization of this section of the chapter. First, the aromatic precursor chorismate is converted to p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) by the action of three proteins. Second, the pteridine portion of folate is made from GTP and coupled to PABA to generate dihydropteroate, and the bifunctional protein specified by folC, dihydrofolate synthetase, or folylpolyglutamate synthetase, adds the initial glutamate molecule to form dihydrofolate (H2PteGlu1, or dihydropteroylmonoglutamate). Dihydrofolate is then reduced to tetrahydrofolate by dihydrofolate reductase (FolA or FolM), and the folylpolyglutamate synthetase function of FolC adds two additional glutamyl residues to form H4PteGlu3 (tetrahydropteroyltriglutamate). The reactions involved in the synthesis of the pteridine ring were extensively reviewed in the first edition of this work (14), which can be referred to for a more historical perspective. The overall synthesis of tetrahydrofolate is depicted in Fig. 5, along with the structures of the intermediates. The names of genes known to be involved in folate biosynthesis are also shown in Fig. 5. Since folate and its reduced derivatives cannot cross the inner membrane of E. coli, most of the folate biosynthetic pathway was first worked out biochemically by isolating intermediates and characterizing purified or partially purified proteins; much of this early work was accomplished in the laboratory of Gene Brown. In contrast, since PABA does freely enter E. coli cells, this part of the pathway was first identified genetically, with the biochemistry being completed later.
Although it was shown in 1950 that PABA was derived from the same pathway as the aromatic amino acids tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan, it was only in 1967 that Huang and Pittard (44) used mutagenesis techniques to obtain strains of E. coli that required PABA for growth. They identified two loci, which they named pabA and pabB. In the early 1980s, investigators in the laboratory of Brian Nichols cloned pabA and pabB (32, 47). Nucleotide sequence analysis of pabA and pabB revealed the corresponding deduced amino acid sequences to be 44 and 26% identical, respectively, to those of the homologous subunits of anthranilate synthase. Despite this similarity, the subunits of anthranilate synthase could not substitute for the analogous subunits in PABA synthase or vice versa.
In 1989, Nichols et al. (73) constructed two plasmid-containing strains that overexpressed the products of pabA and pabB. Studies with these partially purified enzymes showed that the conversion of chorismate to PABA occurs in two steps. PabA and PabB act upon chorismate and glutamine to form a diffusible intermediate, which is then converted to PABA by the action of a third enzyme, at that time termed enzyme X. In 1985, Teng et al. (103) synthesized the proposed intermediate in the biosynthesis of PABA, 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate (Fig. 5). They found that cell extracts from a strain overexpressing PabB converted 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate to PABA at a rate commensurate with a biological function of this compound as an intermediate in PABA biosynthesis. This intermediate was subsequently identified as 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate (2, 114). Enzyme X was then renamed aminodeoxychorismate lyase, and the complex containing PABA synthase components I and II, the pabA and pabB gene products, was named aminodeoxychorismate synthase.
In summary, PABA is one of seven aromatic products derived from chorismate in E. coli. Chorismate is converted to PABA in two steps through the action of three gene products, PabA, PabB, and PabC. 4-Amino-4-deoxychorismate synthase, a heterodimer of PabA and PabB, converts chorismate and glutamine to aminodeoxychorismate and glutamate. Aminodeoxychorismate lyase aromatizes aminodeoxychorismate, releasing pyruvate and generating PABA.
Although the early literature is replete with references to PABA synthase, it is likely that these studies involved aminodeoxychorismate synthase components I and II, with enough contaminating lyase to support activity, since gel filtration experiments fail to separate the native synthase from the lyase, both of which elute with apparent molecular weights of about 50,000 (80).
Aminodeoxychorismate synthase (PabA, PabB).
Aminodeoxychorismate synthase or its components can catalyze the following reactions.
chorismate + glutamine → aminodeoxychorismate + glutamate (reaction 1)
chorismate + NH3 ↔ aminodeoxychorismate (reaction 2)
glutamine → glutamate + NH3 (reaction 3)
Although reactions 1 and 3 require both aminodeoxychorismate synthase components I and II, the products of pabB and pabA, respectively, reaction 2 can be carried out by PabB alone.
Current research suggests that the physiological reaction occurs as follows. PabA acts as a glutaminase that generates ammonia from glutamine, although activation requires equimolar amounts of PabB (89). PabB then uses the ammonia to aminate chorismate, generating aminodeoxychorismate (89). PabC acts separately to generate PABA from aminodeoxychorismate (34). Research from the Nichols laboratory strongly suggests that free ammonia is not a physiological substrate for PabB (109). For reaction 2, the measured Km for ammonia was 360 mM in the presence of PabA and 140 mM in the absence of PabA, whereas the Km for glutamine in reaction 1 was about 1 mM. pabA mutants require more than 50 mM ammonia to grow (81). The hydrolysis of cellular glutamine will not generate enough ammonia to support the PabB-dependent amination of chorismate. In contrast, trpG mutants, which lack anthranilate synthase component II, require only 1 mM ammonia for growth (116).
Aminodeoxychorismate synthase is a heterodimer composed of a fairly loose association between PabA and PabB (81). The X-ray crystal structure of E. coli PabB was determined to 2.0-Å resolution (76). The monomer has a complex α/β fold similar to that of known anthranilate synthase structures. It is fascinating that in the region of PabB analogous to the regulatory region of anthranilate synthase there is a tightly bound tryptophan molecule. Since this tryptophan can be removed only by denaturing conditions and is within an area highly conserved among chorismate-dependent enzymes, it may possess a structural role. In 1989 Irving Crawford compared sequences of genes involved in homologous reactions and theorized that pabB and trpE arose from the duplication of a common gene ancestor, followed by divergence (19). The observation of a tryptophan binding pocket within a highly conserved region lends support to his theory.
The pabA genes from E. coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium have been shown to specify polypeptides with a predicted molecular mass of 21 kDa (46, 47). Expression studies reveal that pabA from E. coli is expressed constitutively from a monocistronic transcript (104, 105). However, it has also been reported that pabA is expressed from a transcript including fic, the gene upstream of pabA (53).
The pabB genes from E. coli (32) and Salmonella serovar Typhimurium (31) have been isolated, and their nucleotide sequences have been analyzed. The E. coli pabB gene consists of 1,359 nucleotides specifying a protein of 453 residues with a predicted molecular mass of ~51 kDa.
Properties of aminodeoxychorismate lyase (PabC).
4-Amino-4-deoxychorismate lyase catalyzes the elimination of pyruvate from 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate and the aromatization of the resulting product to generate PABA. The enzyme was identified in 1989 (73), partially purified in 1990 (114), and further purified in 1991 (34). The enzyme was shown to be a homodimer with ~25-kDa subunits (34, 73, 115). Sequence analysis of the cloned pabC gene identified an open reading frame specifying a protein of 29,700 Da (33). The purified, overexpressed protein was shown to contain a pyridoxal phosphate cofactor (33). In 2000, Nakai et al. reported the X-ray crystal structure of aminodeoxychorismate lyase at 2.2-Å resolution (68). They confirmed that the enzyme was a homodimer with a two-fold crystallographic axis, and they observed that the polypeptide chain had two domains, one large and one small, connected by a loop. The pyridoxal 5-phosphate cofactor is bound at the interface of the two domains.
Transport of PABA.
Little is known about the transport of PABA, although it is clear that PABA is excreted from wild-type cells and can support the growth of strains that are PABA auxotrophs (44).
As shown in Fig. 5, the synthesis of dihydropteroic acid uses GTP as the initial substrate and requires the sequential action of GTP cyclohydrolase I, dihydroneopterin pyrophosphatase, a phosphomonesterase, dihydroneopterin aldolase, 6-hydroxymethyl-dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase, and dihydropteroate synthase. This figure also provides the structural gene designations where known.
GTP cyclohydrolase I (FolE).
GTP cyclohydrolase I, so named to differentiate this enzyme from GTP cyclohydrolase II, which catalyzes the first step in the biosynthesis of riboflavin from GTP, was identified in E. coli and subsequently characterized by Brown and coworkers (16, 28, 111). The enzyme catalyzes the overall reaction shown in reaction 4.
GTP + 2H2O → H2neopterin triphosphate + formate (reaction 4)
The reaction occurs in four steps, which include an Amadori rearrangement (Fig. 6). The intermediates in the GTP cyclohydrolase I-catalyzed reaction are noncovalently bound, and those in the GTP cyclohydrolase II-catalyzed reaction have been proposed to be covalently bound to the protein (85). The enzyme was purified 3,900-fold to homogeneity by Yim and Brown (115), who determined that subunits of the enzyme have a molecular mass of ~25 kDa and that the enzyme binds one molecule of GTP per subunit and has a Km of 20 nM for GTP. Unlike many other enzymes that catalyze the committing step in a biochemical pathway, GTP cyclohydrolase I exhibits no feedback inhibition by end products.
The X-ray crystal structure of E. coli GTP cyclohydrolase I has been solved by Nar et al., who determined that the torus-shaped enzyme is composed of 10 identical subunits arranged as a pentamer of tightly associated dimers (71). Subsequently, the structure of the enzyme bound to the substrate analogue, dGTP, was determined. The enzyme possesses 10 identical active sites, each of which is at the interface of three subunits. Site-directed mutagenesis of active-site residues was used to relate enzyme activity to catalytically important residues (70). Directed mutagenesis of His-179 yielded a GTP cyclohydrolase I that catalyzed a conversion of GTP to the intermediate 2-amino-5-formylamino-6-ribofuranosylamino-4(3H)-pyrimidinone 5'-triphosphate, as determined by multinuclear magnetic resonance. The wild-type enzyme converts this intermediate into product dihydroneopterin triphosphate at a rate equivalent to that of the generation of the product from GTP (12). Crystallographic studies of the human GTP cyclohydrolase, and the discovery of an essential zinc molecule in that enzyme, led to the reinvestigation of the E. coli protein. The use of EDTA in earlier preparations precluded this observation of a metal cofactor. In the E. coli enzyme, the zinc molecule is bound to Cys-100, Cys-118, and His-113 on each subunit (4). Single-turnover quenched-flow experiments were performed, and the rate constant for the reversible opening of the GTP imidazole ring was determined to be 0.9 s-1, in comparison to the rate constant for the release of formate (2.0 s-1) and the rate constant for the formation of product dihydroneopterin triphosphate (0.03 s-1). Surprisingly, the opening of the imidazole ring is not the rate-limiting step for this complex reaction (92).
The gene coding for E. coli GTP cyclohydrolase I, folE, has been cloned (48), the corresponding amino acid sequence has been determined (49), and the gene has been mapped at 45 min on the E. coli chromosome (~2,250 kbp) (84). The open reading frame contains 669 nucleotides, specifying a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 25,873. Recently, it has been found that folE is regulated by the metJ repressor (62). Using DNA arrays and a strain with a deletion of the methionine repressor, metJ, Marines et al. (62) created an in vitro assay for transcription. They observed a fourfold derepression of folE in the metJ knockout strain compared to that in cells transformed with the wild-type repressor. MetJ is a ribbon-helix-ribbon DNA binding protein that binds two S-adenosylmethionine molecules as corepressors. It makes sense that folE would be sensitive to the methionine regulon since methionine synthase requires methylenetetrahydrofolate as a methyl donor for the methylation of homocysteine.
Dihydroneopterin triphosphate pyrophosphatase (FolQ?).
Suzuki and Brown (96) proposed that two separate enzyme-catalyzed steps were necessary in the conversion of dihydroneopterin triphosphate to dihydroneopterin. The first step was proposed to be catalyzed by dihydroneopterin triphosphate pyrophosphatase, and the removal of the third phosphate group was proposed to be catalyzed by nonspecific phosphate monoesterases. However, more recently it has been proposed that the release of pyrophosphate occurs nonenzymatically under the influence of divalent cations (22).
E. coli dihydroneopterin triphosphate pyrophosphatase catalyzes the removal of pyrophosphate from dihydroneopterin triphosphate to yield dihydroneopterin monophosphate. This enzyme was purified ~50-fold and partially characterized by Suzuki and Brown (96). The molecular weight of the enzyme is 17,000. The enzyme requires a magnesium ion for activity and will not recognize nucleoside triphosphates as substrates. The Km for dihydroneopterin triphosphate is 11 μM. The gene specifying dihydroneopterin triphosphate pyrophosphatase has not yet been identified. However, Klaus and his colleagues recently identified ylgG as the gene specifying a pyrophosphohydrolase in Lactococcus lactis that corresponds to part of a multicistronic folate synthesis operon and that exhibits high activity towards dihydroneopterin triphosphate (52). A BLAST search of the E. coli K-12 genome identifies ymfB as the closest homologue. This gene specifies a protein annotated as a putative bifunctional thiamine pyrimidine pyrophosphate hydrolase and shows 33% identity and 53% similarity to ylgG. If YmfB is shown to catalyze the conversion of dihydroneopterin triphosphate to dihydroneopterin monophosphate, it should be renamed FolQ, as has the YlgG protein from Lactococcus lactis.
Phosphomonoesterase.
Suzuki and Brown (96) showed that several phosphomonoesterases in E. coli could catalyze the removal of the phosphate group from dihydroneopterin monophosphate, but no single enzyme showed specificity for dihydroneopterin monophosphate.
Dihydroneopterin aldolase (FolB).
Dihydroneopterin aldolase reacts with dihydroneopterin to generate 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin (6-CH2OH-[H2]pterin) and glycolaldehyde. The enzyme from E. coli is remarkably heat stable, which greatly aided in the purification of the enzyme. The molecular weight was estimated to be ~100,000 by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and gel filtration (65, 66). The Km for dihydroneopterin is 9 μM. The enzyme is highly specific for dihydroneopterin and will not use neopterin or the mono- or triphosphate of dihydroneopterin. The product 6-CH2OH-dihydroneopterin is a good inhibitor, with a Ki of 1.7 μM. The ygiG gene specifying this protein was expressed, and the purified protein was characterized by Haussman et al. and designated FolB (41). They determined that the subunit molecular weight was 12,500 and that the active protein is a homo-octamer, consistent with the results of the earlier studies. Interest in this enzyme as a potential antibiotic target has led to several studies of potential inhibitors (91, 118). Although a structure of the E. coli enzyme has not been reported, an X-ray structure of the enzyme from Staphylococcus aureus has been reported (42). This enzyme has 27% identity to the E. coli enzyme. The enzyme is a homo-octomer, and the active site is located between two adjacent subunits. Mechanistic studies of the S. aureus enzyme confirm the mechanism initially proposed for the E. coli enzyme, which involves the abstraction of a proton from the β-hydroxy group and rearrangement to form an enamine intermediate that collapses to the product (42).
6-Hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase (FolK).
Hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase (HPPK) converts 6-CH2OH-dihydropterin to its pyrophosphate ester with ATP as the donor of the pyrophosphate group (82). The enzyme activity requires Mg2+. Talarico et al. (99) have purified HPPK more than 10,000-fold to homogeneity. The native enzyme had a mass of 25 kDa as determined by gel electrophoresis in the presence and absence of sodium dodecyl sulfate and thus must be monomeric. Kinetic studies with the pure protein yielded Kmvalues of 1.6 μM for 6-CH2OH-dihydropterin and 17 μM for ATP.
The X-ray crystal structure of HPPK was determined by several groups; first, it was crystallized as an apoenzyme (113) and then in the ternary complex with ATP and a pterin analogue (94). Both structural studies revealed that the first two-thirds of the protein contain four strands of antiparallel β ?sheet with helical connections. Further structural studies including nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray analysis of HPPK revealed that the binding of Mg-ADP resulted in notable changes in the relative conformation of the three loops implicated in catalysis. While both loops 2 and 3 are relatively flexible and are thought to be involved in ligand recognition and catalysis, the largest change was associated with loop 3, in which some amino acids moved more than 17 Å away from the active site (51, 60, 112). Loop 3 is not necessary for protein folding or the binding of Mg-ATP but is necessary for catalysis (10). Based on the body of data from structural, kinetic, and thermodynamic experiments, HPPK employs a bi-bi mechanism in which ATP binds first, followed by 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin (8).
The folK gene was subsequently cloned, its sequence was determined, and the gene product was overexpressed (100). The open reading frame of the folK gene is 477 bp in length, coding for a protein with a predicted molecular weight of 17,945. The open reading frame for folK is just 8 nucleotides downstream of pcnB, a gene involved in controlling plasmid copy number (61), and pcnB and folK may be transcribed as a polycistronic mRNA molecule.
Dihydropteroate synthase (FolP).
Dihydropteroate synthase catalyzes the condensation of PABA and 6-CH2OH-dihydropterin pyrophosphate to form dihydropteroate (H2pteroate). The reactants and products for this reaction in E. coli were elucidated in the laboratory of Gene Brown (82). Although p-aminobenzoylglutamate (PABAGlu) may be used instead of PABA as the substrate to generate dihydrofolate, dihydropteroate synthase uses PABA ten times more efficiently than PABAGlu. For the purified enzyme from E. coli, the Km for PABA is 2.5 μM, whereas the Ki for PABAGlu as a competitive inhibitor is 1.3 mM (83). This observation, together with the fact that it proved impossible to isolate a PABAGlu-requiring strain and no enzyme was ever found in any organism that could condense PABA and glutamate, led researchers to conclude that the biological substrate for dihydropteroate synthase is PABA and that dihydropteroate is the true intermediate in the synthesis of dihydrofolate.
Talarico et al. purified dihydropteroate synthase more than 700-fold from a wild-type strain, obtaining an apparently homogenous enzyme (99). The native enzyme is a dimer with ~30-kDa subunits. Kinetic studies of the pure enzyme yielded Km values for 6-CH2OH-dihydropterin pyrophosphate and PABA of 1.9 and 0.5 μM, respectively.
Dallas et al. cloned, determined the sequence of, and overexpressed the folP gene encoding dihydropteroate synthase, which lies at 71.5 min (20, 21). The open reading frame of the gene contains 846 bp and is predicted to code for a polypeptide of 282 amino acids with a mass of 30,314 Da.
Dihydrofolate synthetase catalyzes the synthesis of dihydrofolate from dihydropteroate, glutamate, and ATP and requires Mg2+ for activity. The enzyme was partially purified and the reaction in E. coli was first characterized by Griffin and Brown (35). In E. coli, dihydrofolate synthetase and folylpolyglutamate synthetase are activities contained on a single bifunctional protein (24, 26). In 1985, Bognar et al. cloned the folC gene and expressed the folC gene product ~400-fold over levels in a wild-type strain (11). They purified the overexpressed dihydrofolate synthetase activity to homogeneity. Dihydrofolate synthetase activity copurified with folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity. The enzyme was shown to be a monomer of ~45 kDa. Kinetic experiments were performed, and the Km values for dihydropteroate, ATP, and glutamate were found to be 0.6 μM, 6.9 μM, and 3.9 mM, respectively.
The recent determination of the crystal structures of E. coli FolC bound to various substrates and analogues revealed that although the ATP binding site and the active-site structures are similar to those of the enzyme from Lactobacillus casei, the dihydropteroate binding site structure was very different (64). Because the L. casei enzyme is considered to be a model for human folylpolyglutamate synthetase, these differences may be exploitable in the design of specific inhibitors of E. coli FolC.
The folC gene in E. coli is essential, as evidenced by the observation that the chromosomal gene can be inactivated only if a second folC gene is present in trans (78). The availability of strains with folC deleted from the chromosome permitted the isolation and characterization of plasmid-carried mutant folC gene products in the absence of the wild-type enzyme. Such mutants are described in papers from the Bognar laboratory (50, 78).
Sulfonamide derivatives (Fig. 7) are structural analogues of PABA and compete with PABA for condensation with 6-hydroxymethylpterin pyrophosphate in the reaction catalyzed by dihydropteroate synthase (13, 87). The pterin-sulfonamide adducts are thought not to be inhibitory to cellular function and passively diffuse out of the cell (13, 87). Since sulfonamide derivatives compete with PABA for dihydropteroate synthase, the cell becomes depleted of dihydropteroate and reduced folates derived from dihydropteroate (7, 40, 87). Mechanisms of development of sulfonamide resistance include alterations in cellular transport properties (13, 45, 77), modification of the inhibitor (13, 87), overproduction of PABA (15), and mutation of dihydropteroate synthase.
The mechanism of sulfonamide resistance that has been best characterized is mutation to form a sulfonamide-resistant dihydropteroate synthase. Several groups have isolated resistant dihydropteroate synthases from strains of E. coli that are resistant to sulfathiazole (21, 77, 97, 108). In all cases so far characterized, the resistant dihydropteroate synthase has a decreased ratio of the Kmfor PABA to the Ki for sulfanilamide, allowing the enzyme to discriminate more effectively between the natural substrate and the inhibitor (21, 97). In two cases, the mutant folP has been sequenced and found to contain a Phe-28-to-Leu change (21) or a Pro-64-to-Ser mutation (107). In addition, sulfonamide resistance conferred by R-plasmids isolated from resistant pathological strains of E. coli has been shown to involve resistant dihydropteroate synthases (101). Two different dihydropteroate synthase genes from R-plasmids, sulI and sulII, have been identified (98). Sequence analysis revealed that these genes share 50% identity but are not closely related to folP from the E. coli chromosome (36, 79, 95).
The chromosomally carried gene for dihydrofolate reductase in E. coli (folA) specifies a monomeric protein with a molecular weight of ~18,000. This protein is very sensitive to inhibition by trimethoprim and its analogues, forming the basis for effective treatments directed against gram-negative organisms. Resistance to trimethoprim is often associated with the production of a plasmid-carried dihydrofolate reductase that is structurally unrelated and is a tetramer with ~8-kDa subunits.
Dihydrofolate reductase (FolA).
The major chromosomally encoded enzyme responsible for the reduction of dihydrofolate (H2folate) to the physiologically active tetrahydrofolate (H4folate) is the folA gene product. The enzyme dihydrofolate reductase catalyzes the reaction shown below.
NADPH + H+ + H2folate ↔ NADP+ + H4folate (reaction 5)
Although dihydrofolate reductase from many organisms, including some strains of E. coli, will also carry out a very slow reduction of folic acid to dihydrofolate (9), strains of E. coli do not transport folates, and this reaction presumably does not occur in vivo. The E. coli enzyme is needed to reduce newly synthesized dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate. Dihydrofolate is also formed in the reaction catalyzed by thymidylate synthase.
dUMP + CH2-H4folate → dTMP + H2folate (reaction 6)
In this reaction, CH2-H4folate serves a dual function, providing both a one-carbon unit (the methylene group) for the methylation of dUMP and the reducing equivalents necessary to convert a methylene to a methyl group. Dihydrofolate reductase must therefore reduce dihydrofolate as rapidly as it is formed during the de novo biosynthesis of dTMP in order to prevent the depletion of cellular stores of tetrahydrofolate derivatives.
Since E. coli dihydrofolate reductase is a rather small protein of considerable importance as a target for chemotherapy, it has been extensively characterized and its structure is known to high resolution. Excellent reviews and original papers can be consulted for detailed information about the structure and mechanism of the enzyme (9, 17, 27).
The enzyme is usually assayed spectrophotometrically by measuring the consumption of NADPH at 340 nm during the reduction of dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate (63). The absorbance changes at 340 nm are due both to the oxidation of NADPH and to the reduction of dihydrofolate and are associated with a molar extinction change at 340 nm of 12,300 cm-1 (9). This method is not suitable for the measurement of activity in crude extracts, for which a radioisotopic method of activity measurement should be employed (86).
The wild-type chromosomal gene for dihydrofolate reductase (folA) in an E. coli K-12 strain was cloned into pBR322 following enrichment of the gene by bacteriophage Mu-mediated transposition (88). The predicted amino acid sequence was 160 residues long and had an estimated molecular weight of 17,998. folA lies at 1 min on the E. coli chromosome (6).
Although it might have been expected that a deletion mutation leading to the complete loss of folA expression would be lethal, strains containing a deletion of the folA gene have been isolated from thyA strains independently in two different laboratories (1, 43). These strains are auxotrophic for thymine, adenine, pantothenate, glycine, and methionine and are viable only in the thyA background. The auxotrophies are those expected for a strain that is unable to produce sufficient reduced forms of tetrahydrofolate for one-carbon transfer reactions. The requirement of a thyA background is more perplexing. thyA is the structural gene for thymidylate synthase, and a thyA mutant would therefore fail to generate dihydrofolate from tetrahydrofolate. However, if there were no tetrahydrofolate derivatives in ΔfolA strains, then thymidylate synthase activity should not affect the phenotype. A solution to this dilemma appeared with the observations of Hamm-Alvarez et al. that tetrahydrofolate derivatives are present in the strains with deletions of the folA gene (38). Although the identity of the enzyme responsible for the formation of tetrahydrofolate derivatives in folA mutant strains is not known, it may be the recently identified dihydropteridine reductase of E. coli (3, 106), which has dihydrofolate reductase activity, or it may be FolM (see below).
Dihydrofolate reductase (FolM).
A second chromosomally encoded gene product capable of catalyzing the dihydrofolate reductase reaction was identified, cloned, and partially characterized by Giladi et al. (30). Knowing that a number of groups had independently gathered evidence supporting the notion of a second dihydrofolate reductase in E. coli, these researchers looked for candidate genes. Pteridine reductase (PTR1) is a short-chain dehydrogenase-reductase that is found in parasitic trypanosomatids and possesses the ability to reduce folate to tetrahydrofolate using NADPH (72). Giladi et al. performed a BLAST search of wild-type E. coli using the Leishmania PTR1 protein sequence as a query and identified ydgB as a homologous gene that also exhibits conservation in corresponding amino acids known to be essential for activity. Using PCR, they cloned the 723-bp gene and demonstrated that cloned ydgB could complement a folA mutant strain. They were unable to generate a folA ydgB double mutant. Strains overexpressing ydgB were highly resistant to trimethoprim. A plasmid containing ydgB with a histidine tag at the amino terminus of the gene product was used to generate protein that could be purified by nickel affinity chromatography. Kinetic analysis of the 26-kDa purified protein yielded Km values for dihydrofolate and NADPH of 9.5 and 1.9 μM, respectively. The enzyme could not reduce folic acid over a pH range of 4.7 to 7, and its ability to reduce biopterin was only 10% of its ability to reduce dihydrofolate. Methotrexate is a competitive inhibitor with a Ki of 5.9 μM; trimethoprim does not inhibit FolM at concentrations of up to 138 mM. Because of its product’s enhanced ability to reduce dihydrofolate over biopterin, ydgB was renamed folM. The FolM gene is located at 36 min on the E. coli chromosome. The physiological role of FolM may not be completely understood, however, as the Vmax of FolM is only about 20% that of FolA and folA mutants are fully complemented only by the overexpression of FolM.
R-plasmid-carried dihydrofolate reductase.
Shortly after trimethoprim was introduced as a clinical drug, bacterial strains that were resistant to trimethoprim and contained an R-plasmid that specified a trimethoprim-insensitive dihydrofolate reductase were isolated (5). Two types of resistant dihydrofolate reductase appeared to be synthesized: type I enzymes exhibiting a several-thousand-fold reduction in sensitivity to trimethoprim and type II enzymes with complete insensitivity to trimethoprim. The type II enzymes are especially interesting because they are genetically and structurally unrelated to chromosomally encoded dihydrofolate reductases. The R67 type II enzyme is a tetramer of identical 8.4-kDa subunits (93), and the active site is located in a pore passing through the center of the protein with residues from each monomer contributing to the active site (117). The evolutionary origin of the enzyme specified by the R-plasmid is not known.
Folylpolyglutamate synthetase—the FolC gene product.
The monoglutamate form of dihydrofolate that is the product of the de novo biosynthetic pathway discussed above is a substrate for dihydrofolate reductase, and the tetrahydrofolate monoglutamate product is itself a substrate for serine hydroxymethyltransferase and the enzymes that interconvert methylenetetrahydrofolate with other tetrahydrofolate cofactors. The addition of glutamyl residues by folylpolyglutamate synthetase probably occurs after the reduction of newly synthesized dihydrofolate to tetrahydrofolate and its conversion to other tetrahydrofolate derivatives. The folC gene product is a bifunctional enzyme that also catalyzes the addition of the glutamyl residue to dihydropteroate to form dihydrofolate [see "Biosynthesis of 7,8-Dihydrofolate–Dihydrofolate Synthetase (FolC)," above]. The two reactions catalyzed by FolC are shown below.
H2pteroate (H2Pte) + ATP + l-glutamate → H2folate (H2PteGlu1) + ADP + HPO42- (reaction 7)
H4PteGlun + ATP + l-glutamate → H4PteGlun+1 + ADP + HPO42- (reaction 8)
FolC adds successive glutamyl residues to H4PteGlu1 by linking each glutamyl residue to the γ-carboxyl group of the terminal glutamyl residue (Fig. 2). Thus, the isopeptide bonds formed are not the normal amide bonds to the α-carboxyl group of glutamate and are not hydrolyzed by peptidases or proteases that are specific for α-carboxyl group-linked peptide bonds. The preferred monoglutamate substrate is 10-CHO-H4PteGlu1, and H2PteGlu1 is a very poor substrate (Barry Shane, personal communication). The preferred diglutamate substrate is 5,10-CH2-H4PteGlu2. Although the enzyme forms triglutamates and tetraglutamates, the formation of longer-chain folates occurs very slowly, particularly when the glutamate concentration is low (39). The X-ray structure of E. coli FolC has recently been determined (64).
A folylpolyglutamate synthetase that forms α-linked peptide bonds.
Studies on the in vivo distribution of polyglutamate chain lengths of folate derivatives in E. coli during exponential growth in Luria broth (29) indicated that mono- and triglutamate derivatives were most abundant, with tetra-, penta-, and hexaglutamate derivatives also found in order of decreasing abundance (Fig. 8). However, in stationary phase, cells were found to contain longer-chain folylpolyglutamates, with the predominant chain length now consisting of six or seven glutamyl residues. Since the FolC enzyme predominantly forms triglutamyl residues both in vivo (67) and in vitro (38), the in vivo distribution of folylpolyglutamates was puzzling. Ferone and his colleagues have shown that there is a second folylpolyglutamate synthase in E. coli that adds additional glutamyl residues to triglutamate derivatives, but this enzyme adds residues to the α-carboxyl group rather than the γ-carboxyl group of the terminal glutamyl residue (23, 25). Conditions governing the expression of this second folylpolyglutamate synthase have not been studied, nor is the gene encoding this protein identified. A BLAST search of the E. coli W3110 genome for homologues of the FolC gene yielded limited similarities to ypdE, annotated as a predicted peptidase gene, and mpl, encoding UDP-N-acetylmuramate:l-alanyl-gamma-d-glutamyl-meso-diaminopimelate ligase. It has not yet been determined whether the long-chain folylpolyglutamates produced in stationary phase contain any α-linkages.
H2PteGlu6 and the assembly of T4 phage.
Bacteriophage T4 infection of E. coli has been shown to cause alterations in the metabolism of folate derivatives. Infection is associated with an increase in the chain lengths in folylpolyglutamates and particularly the accumulation of hexaglutamate derivatives (56, 69). Dihydropteroylhexaglutamate (H2PteGlu6) was shown to be a structural component of the phage baseplate (58), and six molecules are present in the baseplate. Four folate-related proteins specified by the T4D phage genome are gene product 29, a protein with folylpolyglutamate synthetase activity; gene product 28, a protein with folylpolyglutamate hydrolase (γ-glutamyl carboxypeptidase) activity (90); the td gene product, thymidylate synthase; and the frd gene product, dihydrofolate reductase. In cells infected with T4D gp28 mutants, there was a marked increase in the amount of very large folylpolyglutamates and up to 8% of the cell folates contained as many as 12 to 14 glutamate residues (57, 59). The phage-induced folylpolyglutamate synthetase used dihydrofolate derivatives almost as well as tetrahydrofolate derivatives (90), in contrast to FolC, for which H2PteGlu1 is a very poor substrate, while the phage-induced hydrolase appeared to degrade long-chain dihydropteroylpolyglutamates to the hexaglutamate. H2PteGlu6 was proposed to play a critical role in linking together the six wedge-shaped elements that form the baseplate (55). The pteridine portion of the folate was proposed to bind to a site on the phage dihydrofolate reductase, which was thought to be a component of the central plug. The long, flexible polyglutamate was proposed to form a flexible bond between the proximal end of the phage long tail fiber and the baseplate. A 12-Å cryoelectron microscopy image of the structure of the bacteriophage T4 baseplate has now been published (54) in which none of the folate-associated gene products have been located. Furthermore, an immunoblot assay with antibody raised to highly purified recombinant T4 phage dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase suggested that these proteins are not part of the virion structure (18). Thus, it is not clear whether dihydrofolate hexaglutamate is a structural component of the T4 phage baseplate or an adventitious contaminant.
Studies from the Green laboratory have been funded by R15 GM071009; those from the Matthews laboratory have been funded by R01 GM24908 from the National Institutes of Health.
References
1. Ahrweiler, P. M., and C. Frieden. 1988. Construction of a fol mutant strain of Escherichia coli for use in dihydrofolate reductase mutagenesis experiments. J. Bacteriol. 170:3301–3304.[PubMed]
2. Anderson, K. S., W. M. Kati, Q.-Z. Ye, J. Liu, C. T. Walsh, A. J. Benesi, and K. A. Johnson. 1991. Isolation and structure elucidation of the 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate intermediate of the p-aminobenzoate enzymatic pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:3198–3200. [CrossRef]
3. Armarego, W. L. F., and S. G. Vasudevan. 1990. Escherichia coli dihydropteridine reductase is a trifunctional enzyme with dihydrofolate reductase activity, p. 616–619. In H.-C. Curtius, S. Ghisla, and N. Blau (ed.), Chemistry and Biology of Pteridines. Walter deGruyter, Berlin, Germany.
4. Auerbach, G., A. Herrmann, A. Bracher, G. Bader, M. Butlich, M. Fischer, M. Neukamm, M. Garrido-Franco, J. Richardson, H. Nar, R. Huber, and A. Bacher. 2000. Zinc plays a key role in human and bacterial GTP cyclohydrolase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13567–13572.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
5. Aymes, S. G. B., and J. T. Smith. 1974. R-factor trimethoprim resistance mechanism: an insusceptible target site. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 58:412–418.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
6. Bachmann, B. 1987. Linkage map of Escherichia coli K-12, edition 7. In F. C. Neidhardt, J. L. Ingraham, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, vol. 2. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
7. Baumstark, B. R., L. L. Spramulli, U. L. RajBhandary, and G. M. Brown. 1977. Initiation of protein synthesis without formylation in a mutant of Escherichia coli that grows in the absence of tetrahydrofolate. J. Bacteriol. 129:457–471.[PubMed]
8. Bermingham, A., J. R. Bottomley, W. U. Primrose, and J. P. Derrick. 2000. Equilibrium and kinetic studies of substrate binding to 6-hydromethyl-7,8-dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 275:17962–17967.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
9. Blakley, R. L. 1984. Dihydrofolate reductase, p. 191–253. In R. L. Blakley and S. J. Benkovic (ed.), Folates and Pterins, vol. 1. The Chemistry and Biology of Folates. Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
10. Blaszcyk, J., Y. Li, Y. Wu, G. Shi, X. Ji, and H. Yan. 2004. Essential roles of a dynamic loop in the catalysis of hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase. Biochemistry 43:1469–1477.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
11. Bognar, A. L., C. Osborne, B. Shane, S. C. Singer, and R. Ferone. 1985. Folylpoly-gamma-glutamate synthetase–dihydrofolate synthetase: cloning and high expression of the Escherichia coli folC gene and purification and properties of the gene product. J. Biol. Chem. 260:5625–5630.[PubMed]
12. Bracher, A., M. Fischer, W. Eisenreich, H. Ritz, N. Schramek, P. Boyle, P. Bentili, R. Huber, H. Nar, G. Auerbach, and A. Bacher. 1999. Histidine 179 mutants of GTP cyclohydrolase I catalyze the formation of 2-amino-5-formylamino-6-ribofuranosylamino-4(3H)-pyrimidinone triphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 274:16727–16735.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
13. Brown, G. M. 1962. The biosynthesis of folic acid. II. Inhibition by sulfonamides. J. Biol. Chem. 237:536–540.[PubMed]
14. Brown, G. M., and J. M. Williamson. 1987. Biosynthesis of folic acid, riboflavin, thiamin and pantothenic acid, p. 521–538. In F. C. Neidhardt, J. L. Ingraham, K. B. Low, B. Magasanik, M. Schaechter, and H. E. Umbarger (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, vol. 1. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
15. Bruce, I., J. Hardy, and K. A. Stacey. 1984. Potentiation by purines of the growth-inhibitory effects of sulfonamides on Escherichia coli and the location of the gene which mediates this effect. J. Gen. Microbiol. 130:2489–2495.[PubMed]
16. Burg, A. W., and G. M. Brown. 1968. The biosynthesis of folic acid. VIII. Purification and properties of the enzyme that catalyzes the production of formate from carbon atom 8 of guanosine triphosphate. J. Biol. Chem. 243:2349–2358.[PubMed]
17. Bystroff, C., S. J. Oatley, and J. Kraut. 1990. Crystal structures of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase: the NADP+ holoenzyme and the folate-NADP+ ternary complex. Substrate binding and a model for the transition state. Biochemistry 29:3263–3277.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
18. Chen, X., C. K. Mathews, L. J. Wheeler, G. Maley, F. Maley, and D. H. Coombs. 1995. An immunoblot assay reveals that bacteriophage T4 thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase are not virion proteins. J. Virol. 69:2119–2125.[PubMed]
19. Crawford, I. P. 1989. Evolution of a biosynthetic pathway: the tryptophan paradigm. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 43:567–600.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
20. Dallas, W. S., I. K. Dev, and P. H. Ray. 1993. The dihydropteroate synthase gene, folP, is near the leucine tRNA gene, leuU, on the Escherichia coli chromosome. J. Bacteriol. 175:7743–7744.[PubMed]
21. Dallas, W. S., J. E. Gowen, P. H. Ray, M. J. Cox, and I. K. Dev. 1992. Cloning, sequencing, and enhanced expression of the dihydropteroate synthase gene of Escherichia coli MC4100. J. Bacteriol. 174:5961–5970.[PubMed]
22. de Saizieu, A., P. Vankan, and A. P. G. M. van Loon. 1995. Enzymic characterization of Bacillus subtilis GTP cyclohydrolase I. Evidence for a chemical dephosphorylation of dihydroneopterin triphosphate. Biochem. J. 306:371–377.[PubMed]
23. Ferone, R., M. H. Hanlon, S. C. Singer, and D. F. Hunt. 1986. α-Carboxyl-linked glutamates in the folypolyglutamates of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 261:16356–16362.[PubMed]
24. Ferone, R., S. C. Singer, M. H. Hanlon, and S. Roland. 1983. Isolation and characterization of an E. coli mutant affected in dihydrofolate and folypolyglutamate synthetase, p. 585–589. In J. Blair (ed.), Chemistry and Biology of Pteridines. de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany.
25. Ferone, R., S. C. Singer, and D. F. Hunt. 1986. In vitro synthesis of α-carboxyl-linked folylpolyglutamates by an enzyme preparation from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 261:16363–16371.[PubMed]
26. Ferone, R., and A. Warskow. 1983. Co-purification of dihydrofolate synthetase and N10-formyltetrahydropteroyldiglutamate synthetase from E. coli, p. 161–181. In I. D. Goldman, B. A. Chabner, and J. R. Bertino (ed.), Folyl and Antifolyl Polyglutamates. Plenum Press, New York, NY.
27. Fierke, C. A., K. A. Johnson, and S. J. Benkovic. 1987. Construction and evaluation of the kinetic scheme associated with dihydrofolate reductase from Escherichia coli. Biochemistry 26:4085–4092.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
28. Foor, F., and G. M. Brown. 1975. Triphosphate cyclohydrolase II from E. coli. J. Biol. Chem. 250:3545–3551.[PubMed]
29. Furness, R. A. H., and P. C. Loewen. 1981. Detection of p-aminobenzoylpoly(gamma-glutamates) using fluorescamine. Anal. Biochem. 117:126–135.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
30. Giladi, M., N. Altman-Price, I. Levin, L. Levy, and M. Mevarech. 2003. FolM, a new chromosomally encoded dihydrofolate reductase in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 185:7015–7018.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
31. Goncharoff, P., and B. P. Nichols. 1988. Evolution of aminobenzoate synthases: nucleotide sequences of Salmonella typhimurium and Klebsiella aerogenes pabB. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:531–548.[PubMed]
32. Goncharoff, P., and B. P. Nichols. 1984. Nucleotide sequence of Escherichia coli pabB indicates a common evolutionary origin of p-aminobenzoate synthetase and anthranilate synthetase. J. Bacteriol. 159:57–62.[PubMed]
33. Green, J. M., W. K. Merkel, and B. P. Nichols. 1992. Characterization and sequence of Escherichia coli pabC, the gene encoding aminodeoxychorismate lyase, a pyridoxal phosphate-containing enzyme. J. Bacteriol. 174:5317–5323.[PubMed]
34. Green, J. M., and B. P. Nichols. 1991. p-Aminobenzoate biosynthesis in Escherichia coli: purification of aminodeoxychorismate lyase and cloning of pabC. J. Biol. Chem. 266:12971–12975.[PubMed]
35. Griffin, M. J., and G. M. Brown. 1964. The biosynthesis of folic acid. III. Enzymatic formation of dihydrofolic acid from dihydropteroic acid and of tetrahydropteroylpolyglutamic acid compounds from tetrahydrofolic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 239:310–316.[PubMed]
36. Guerineau, F., and P. Mullineaux. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of the sulfonamide resistance gene from plasmid R46. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:4370. [CrossRef]
37. Hamm-Alvarez, S., A. Sancar, and K. V. Rajagopalan. 1989. Role of enzyme-bound 5,10-methenyltetrahydropteroylpolyglutamate in catalysis by Escherichia coli DNA photolyase. J. Biol. Chem. 264:9649–9656.[PubMed]
38. Hamm-Alvarez, S. F., A. Sancar, and K. V. Rajagopalan. 1990. The presence and distribution of reduced folates in Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 265:9850–9856.[PubMed]
39. Hanlon, M. H., R. Ferone, K. Weaver, and P. Ray. 1994. Enzymatic synthesis of folate and antifolate polyglutamates with Escherichia coli folylpolyglutamate synthetase. Anal. Biochem. 216:345–351.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
40. Harvey, R. J. 1973. Growth and initiation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli in the presence of trimethoprim. J. Bacteriol. 114:309–322.[PubMed]
41. Haussman, C., F. Rohdich, E. Schmidt, A. Bacher, and G. Richter. 1998. Biosynthesis of pteridines in Escherichia coli: structural and mechanistic similarity of dihydroneopterin-triphosphate epimerase and dihydroneopterin aldolase. J. Biol. Chem. 273:17418–17424.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
42. Hennig, M., A. D'Arcy, I. C. Hampele, M. G. P. Page, C. Oefner, and G. E. Dale. 1998. Crystal structure and reaction mechanism of 7,8-dihydroneopterin aldolase from Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5:357–362.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
43. Howell, E. E., P. G. Foster, and L. M. Foster. 1988. Construction of a dihydrofolate reductase-deficient mutant of Escherichia coli by gene replacement. J. Bacteriol. 170:3040–3045.[PubMed]
44. Huang, M., and J. Pittard. 1967. Genetic analysis of mutant strains of Escherichia coli requiring p-aminobenzoic acid for growth. J. Bacteriol. 93:1938–1942.[PubMed]
45. Hwang, S. Y., D. A. Berges, J. J. Taggart, and C. Gilvarg. 1989. Portage transport of sulfonamide and sulfanilic acid. J. Med. Chem. 32:694–698.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
46. Kaplan, J. B., W. K. Merkel, and B. P. Nichols. 1985. Evolution of glutamine amidotransferase genes: nucleotide sequence of the pabA genes from Salmonella typhimurium, Klebsiella aerogenes, and Serratia marcescens. J. Mol. Biol. 183:327–340.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
47. Kaplan, J. B., and B. P. Nichols. 1983. Nucleotide sequence of Escherichia coli pabA and its evolutionary relationship to trpG(D). J. Mol. Biol. 168:451–468.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
48. Katzenmeier, G., C. Schmid, and A. Bacher. 1990. Cloning and expression of the putative gene coding for GTP cyclohydrolase I from Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 66:231–234. [CrossRef]
49. Katzenmeier, G., C. Schmid, J. Kellermann, F. Lottspeich, and A. Bacher. 1972. Sequence of GTP cyclohydrolase I from Escherichia coli. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 372:991–997.
50. Keshavjee, K., C. Pyne, and A. L. Bognar. 1991. Characterization of a mutation affecting the function of Escherichia coli folylpolyglutamate synthetase-dihydrofolate synthetase and further mutations produced in vitro at the same locus. J. Biol. Chem. 266:19925–19929.[PubMed]
51. Keskin, O., S. Ji, J. Blaszcyk, and D. G. Covell. 2002. Molecular motions and conformational changes of hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase. Proteins 49:191–205.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
52. Klaus, S. M., A. Wegkamp, W. Sybesma, J. Hugenholtz, J. F. Gregory III, and A. D. Hanson. 2005. A nudix enzyme removes pyrophosphate from dihydroneopterin triphosphate in the folate synthesis pathway of bacteria and plants. J. Biol. Chem. 280:5274–5280.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
53. Komono, T., R. Utsumi, and M. Kawamukai. 1991. Functional analysis of the fic gene involved in regulation of cell division. Res. Microbiol. 142:269–277.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
54. Kostyuchenko, V. A., P. G. Lelman, P. R. Chipman, S. Kanamaru, M. J. van Raalj, F. Arisaka, V. V. Mesyanzhinov, and M. G. Rossmann. 2003. Three-dimensional structure of the bacteriophage T4 baseplate. Nat. Struct. Biol. 10:688–693.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
55. Kozloff, L. M. 1983. A structural role for dihydropteroyl hexaglutamate in the tail baseplate of various bacteriophages. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 163:359–374.[PubMed]
56. Kozloff, L. M., and M. Lute. 1973. Bacteriophage tail components. IV. Pteroyl polyglutamate synthesis in T4D-infected Escherichia coli B. J. Virol. 11:630–636.[PubMed]
57. Kozloff, L. M., and M. Lute. 1981. Dual functions of bacteriophage T4D gene 28 product: structural component of the viral tail baseplate central plug and cleavage enzyme for folyl polyglutamates. II. Folate metabolism and polyglutamate cleavage activity of uninfected and infected Escherichia coli cells and bacteriophage. J. Virol. 40:645–656.[PubMed]
58. Kozloff, L. M., and M. Lute. 1965. Folic acid, a structural component of T4 bacteriophage. J. Mol. Biol. 12:780–792.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
59. Kozloff, L. M., and J. Zorzopulos. 1981. Dual functions of bacteriophage T4D gene 28 product: structural component of the viral tail baseplate central plug and cleavage enzyme for folyl polyglutamates. I. Identification of T4D gene 28 product in the tail plug. J. Virol. 40:635–644.[PubMed]
60. Li, Y., Y. Wu, J. Blaszcyk, X. Ji, and H. Yan. 2003. Catalytic roles of arginine residues 82 and 92 of Escherichia coli hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase: site directed mutagenesis and biochemical studies. Biochemistry 42:1469–1477.
61. Liu, J., and J. S. Parkinson. 1989. Genetics and sequence analysis of the pcnB locus, an Escherichia coli gene involved in plasmid copy number control. J. Bacteriol. 171:1254–1261.[PubMed]
62. Marines, F., I. W. Manfield, J. A. Stead, K. J. McDowell, and P. G. Stockley. 2006. Transcript analysis reveals an extended regulon and the importance of protein-protein cooperativity for the Escherichia coli methionine repressor. Biochem. J. 396:227–234.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
63. Mathews, C. K., and F. M. Huennekens. 1963. Further studies on dihydrofolic reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 238:3436–3442.[PubMed]
64. Mathieu, M., G. Debousker, S. Vincent, F. Viviani, N. Bamas-Jacques, and V. Mikol. 2005. Escherichia coli FolC structure reveals an unexpected dihydrofolate binding site providing an attractive target for anti-microbial therapy. J. Biol. Chem. 280:18916–18922.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
65. Mathis, J. B., and G. M. Brown. 1970. The biosynthesis of folic acid. XI. Purification and properties of dihydroneopterin aldolase. J. Biol. Chem. 243:3015–3025.
66. Mathis, J. B., and G. M. Brown. 1980. Dihydroneopterin aldolase from Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 66:556–560.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
67. McBurney, M. W., and G. F. Whitmore. 1974. Isolation and biochemical characterization of folate deficient mutants of Chinese hamster cells. Cell 2:173–182.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
68. Nakai, T., H. Mizutani, I. Miyahara, K. Hirotsu, S. Takeda, K. H. Jhee, T. Yoshimura, and N. Esaki. 2000. Three-dimensional structure of 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate lyase from Escherichia coli. J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 128:29–38.
69. Nakamura, K., and L. M. Kozloff. 1978. Folate polyglutamates in T4D bacteriophage and T4D-infected Escherichia coli. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 540:313–319.[PubMed]
70. Nar, H., R. Huber, G. Auerbach, M. Fischer, C. Hosl, H. Ritz, A. Bracher, W. Meining, S. Everhardt, and A. Bacher. 1995. Active site topology and reaction mechanism of GTP cyclohydrolase I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:12120–12125.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
71. Nar, H., R. Huber, W. Meining, C. Schmid, S. Weinkauf, and A. Bacher. 1995. Atomic structure of GTP cyclohydrolase I. Structure 3:459–466.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
72. Nare, B., L. W. Hardy, and S. M. Beverly. 1997. The roles of pteridine reductase 1 and dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase in pteridine metabolism in the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. J. Biol. Chem. 272:13883–13891.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
73. Nichols, B. P., A. M. Seibold, and S. Z. Doktor. 1989. Para-aminobenzoate synthesis from chorismate occurs in two steps. J. Biol. Chem. 264:8597–8601.[PubMed]
74. Nygaard, P., and J. M. Smith. 1993. Evidence for a novel glycinamide ribonucleotide transformylase in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:3591–3597.[PubMed]
75. Osborne, C. B., K. E. Lowe, and B. Shane. 1993. Regulation of folate and one-carbon metabolism in mammalian cells. I. Folate metabolism in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing Escherichia coli or human folylpoly-γ-glutamate synthetase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 268:21657–21664.[PubMed]
76. Parsons, J. F., P. Y. Jensen, A. S. Packikara, A. J. Howard, A. J. Eisenstein, and J. E. Ladner. 2002. Structure of Escherichia coli aminodeoxychorismate synthase: architectural conservation and diversity in chorismate-utilizing enzymes. Biochemistry 41:2198–2208.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
77. Pato, M. L., and G. M. Brown. 1963. Mechanisms of resistance of Escherichia coli to sulfonamides. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 103:443–448.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
78. Pyne, C., and A. L. Bognar. 1992. Replacement of the folC gene, encoding folylpolyglutamate synthetase-dihydrofolate synthetase in Escherichia coli, with genes mutagenized in vitro. J. Bacteriol. 174:1750–1759.[PubMed]
79. Radstrom, P., and G. Swedberg. 1988. RSF1010 and a conjugative plasmid contain sulII, one of two known genes for plasmid-borne sulfonamide resistance dihydropteroate synthase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32:1684–1692.[PubMed]
80. Rayl, E. A. 1993. Escherichia coli aminodeoxychorismate synthase: residues involved in catalysis and subunit association. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Chicago.
81. Rayl, E. A., J. M. Green, and B. P. Nichols. 1996. Escherichia coli aminodeoxychorismate synthase: analysis of pabB mutations affecting catalysis and subunit interaction. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1295:81–88. [PubMed]
82. Richey, D. P., and G. M. Brown. 1969. The biosynthesis of folic acid. IX. Purification and properties of the enzymes required for the formation of dihydropteroic acid. J. Biol. Chem. 244:1582–1592.[PubMed]
83. Richey, D. P., and G. M. Brown. 1970. A comparison of the effectiveness with which p-aminobenzoic acid and p-aminobenzoylglutamic acid are used as substrate by dihydropteroate synthetase from Escherichia coli. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 222:237–239.[PubMed]
84. Ritz, H., G. Keller, G. Richter, Katzenmeier, and A. Bacher. 1993. Location of the gene coding for GTP cyclohydrolase I on the physical map of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 175:1553.
85. Ritz, H., N. Schramek, A. Bracher, S. Herz, W. Eisenreich, G. Richter, and A. Bacher. 2001. Biosynthesis of riboflavin. Studies on the mechanism of GTP cyclohydrolase II. J. Biol. Chem. 276:22273–22277.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
86. Roberts, D. 1966. An isotopic assay for dihydrofolate reductase. Biochemistry 5:3549–3551.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
87. Roland, S., R. Ferone, R. J. Harvey, V. L. Styles, and R. W. Morrison. 1979. The characteristics and significance of sulfonamides as substrates for Escherichia coli dihydropteroate synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 254:10337–10345.[PubMed]
88. Rood, J. I., A. J. Laird, and J. W. Williams. 1980. Cloning of the Escherichia coli K-12 dihydrofolate reductase gene following mu-mediated transposition. Gene 8:255–265.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
89. Roux, B., and C. T. Walsh. 1992. p-Aminobenzoate synthesis in Escherichia coli: kinetic and mechanistic characterization of the amidotransferase PabA. Biochemistry 31:6904–6910.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
90. Sadewasser, D. A., and L. M. Kozloff. 1983. Identification of bacteriophage T4D gene 29 product, a baseplate hub component, as a folylpolyglutamate synthetase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 116:1119–1124.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
91. Sanders, W. J., V. L. Nienaber, C. G. Lerner, J. O. McCall, S. M. Merrick, S. J. Swanson, J. E. Harlan, V. S. Stoll, G. F. Stamper, S. F. Betz, K. R. Condroski, R. P. Meadows, J. M. Severin, K. A. Walter, P. Magdalinos, C. G. Jakob, R. Wagner, and B. A. Beutel. 2004. Discovery of potent inhibitors of dihydroneopterin aldolase using crystaLEAD high throughput X-ray crystallographic screening and structure directed lead optimization. J. Med. Chem. 47:1709–1718.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
92. Schramek, N., A. Bracher, and A. Bacher. 2000. Ring opening is not rate-limiting in the GTP cyclohydrolase reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 276:2622–2626.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
93. Smith, S. L., D. Stone, P. Novak, D. P. Baccanari, and J. J. Burchall. 1979. R plasmid dihydrofolate reductase with subunit structure. J. Biol. Chem. 254:6222–6225.[PubMed]
94. Stammers, D. K., A. Achari, D. O. Somers, P. K. Bryant, J. Rosemond, D. L. Scott, and J. N. Champness. 1990. 2.0 Å X-ray structure of the ternary complex of 7,8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethypterin pyrophosphokinase from Escherichia coli with ATP and a substrate analogue. FEBS Lett. 456:49–53. [CrossRef]
95. Sundstrom, L., P. Radstrom, G. Swedberg, and O. Skold. 1988. Site-specific recombination promotes linkage between trimethoprim and sulfonamide resistance genes. Sequence characterization of dhfrV and sulI and a recombination active locus of Tn21. Mol. Gen. Genet. 213:191–201.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
96. Suzuki, Y., and G. M. Brown. 1974. The biosynthesis of folic acid. XII. Purification and properties of dihydroneopterin triphosphate pyrophosphorylase. J. Biol. Chem. 249:2405–2410.[PubMed]
97. Swedberg, G., S. Castensson, and O. Skold. 1979. Characterization of mutationally altered dihydropteroate synthase and its ability to form a sulfonamide-containing analog. J. Bacteriol. 137:129–136.[PubMed]
98. Swedberg, G., and O. Skold. 1980. Characterization of different plasmid-borne dihydropteroate synthases mediating bacterial resistance to sulfonamides. J. Bacteriol. 142:1–7.[PubMed]
99. Talarico, T. L., I. K. Dev, W. S. Dallas, R. Ferone, and P. H. Ray. 1991. Purification and partial characterization of 7,8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethylpterin-pyrophosphokinase and 7,8-dihydropteroate synthase from Escherichia coli MC4100. J. Bacteriol. 173:7029–7032.[PubMed]
100. Talarico, T. L., P. H. Ray, I. K. Dev, B. M. Merrill, and W. S. Dallas. 1992. Cloning, sequence analysis, and overexpression of Escherichia coli folK, the gene coding for 7,8-dihydro-6-hydroxymethylpterin pyrophosphokinase. J. Bacteriol. 174:5971–5977.[PubMed]
101. Tanaka, N., J. H. Cramer, and R. H. Rownd. 1976. EcoR1 restriction endonuclease map of the composite R plasmid NR1. J. Bacteriol. 127:619–636.[PubMed]
102. Teller, J. H., S. G. Powers, and E. E. Snell. 1976. Ketopantoate hydroxymethyltransferase. I. Purification and role in pantothenate biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 251:3780–3785.[PubMed]
103. Teng, C.-Y., B. Ganem, S. Z. Doktor, B. P. Nichols, R. K. Bhatnager, and L. C. Vining. 1985. Total synthesis of (±)-4-amino-4-deoxychorismic acid: a key intermediate in the biosynthesis of p-aminobenzoic acid and l-(p-aminophenyl)alanine. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107:5008–5009. [CrossRef]
104. Tran, P. B., T. A. Bannor, S. A. Doktor, and B. P. Nichols. 1990. Chromosomal organization and expression of Escherichia coli pabA. J. Bacteriol. 172:397–410.
105. Tran, P. V., and B. P. Nichols. 1991. Expression of Escherichia coli pabA. J. Bacteriol. 173:3680–3687.[PubMed]
106. Vasudevan, S. G., D. C. Shaw, and W. L. F. Armarego. 1988. Dihydropteridine reductase from Escherichia coli exhibits dihydrofolate reductase activity. Biochem. J. 255:581–588.[PubMed]
107. Vedantam, G., G. G. Guay, N. F. Austria, S. Z. Doktor, and B. P. Nichols. 1998. Characterization of mutations contributing to sulfathiazole resistance in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:88–93.[PubMed]
108. Vedantam, G., and B. P. Nichols. 1998. Characterization of a mutationally altered dihydropteroate synthase contributing to sulfathiazole resistance in Escherichia coli. Microb. Drug Resist. 4:91–97.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
109. Viswanathan, V. K. 1993. Kinetic characterization of p-aminobenzoate biosynthetic enzymes. Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois at Chicago.
110. Whitfield, C. D., E. J. Steers, Jr., and H. Weissbach. 1970. Purification and properties of 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine transmethylase. J. Biol. Chem. 245:390–401.[PubMed]
111. Wolf, W. A., and G. M. Brown. 1969. The biosynthesis of folic acid. X. Evidence for an Amadori rearrangement in the enzymatic formation of dihydroneopterin triphosphate from ATP. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 192:468–478.[PubMed]
112. Xiao, B., G. Shi, J. Gao, J. Blaszczyk, Q. Liu, S. Ji, and H. Yan. 2001. Unusual conformation changes in hydroxymethyldihydropterin pyrophosphokinase as revealed by Xray crystallography and NMR. J. Biol. Chem. 276:40274–40281.[PubMed]
113. Xiao, B., G. Whi, S. Chen, H. Han, and S. Ji. 1999. Crystal structure of 6-hydroxymethyl-7,8-dihydropterin pyrophosphokinase, a potential target for the development of novel antimicrobial agents. Structure 7:489–496.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
114. Ye, Z.-Z., J. Liu, and C. T. Walsh. 1990. p-Aminobenzoate biosynthesis in Escherichia coli: purification and characterization of PabB as aminodeoxychorismate synthase and enzyme X as an aminodeoxychorismate lyase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:9391–9395.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
115. Yim, J. J., and G. M. Brown. 1976. Characteristics of guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase I purified from Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 251:5087–5094.[PubMed]
116. Zalkin, H., and T. Murphy. 1975. Utilization of ammonia for tryptophan synthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 67:1370–1377.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
117. Zhuang, P., M. Yin, J. C. Holland, C. B. Peterson, and E. E. Howell. 1993. Artificial duplication of the R67 dihydrofolate reductase gene to create protein asymmetry. J. Biol. Chem. 268:22672–22679.[PubMed]
118. Zimmerman, M., R. L. Tolman, H. Morman, D. W. Graham, and E. F. Rogers. 1977. Inhibition of folate biosynthesis. 1. Inhibition of dihydroneopterin aldolase by pteridine derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 20:1213–1215.[PubMed] [CrossRef]