Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ 08854
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Phone: (732) 235-4116/4115, Fax: (732) 235-4559, E-mail:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
.
Change in temperature is one of the most common stresses that an organism encounters in nature. When an organism senses downshift in temperature, it responds by eliciting cold shock response. Enterobacteria such as Escherichia coli encounter sudden drastic temperature downshift as a result of excretion from animals. Thus, the cold shock response and adaptation in this bacterium give it a selective advantage of quickly adapting to the new environment. A typical cold shock response in E. coli is exerted when a culture growing exponentially at 37°C is shifted to 15°C. When the cells encounter cold shock, there is a lag period of growth, termed acclimation phase, in which cellular synthesis of most of the proteins is inhibited as opposed to that of a select group of proteins, termed cold shock proteins. These proteins help the cells counteract various detrimental cellular changes triggered by the temperature downshift. This is followed by resumption of the cell growth with restoration of synthesis of normal cellular proteins and decrease in the rate of synthesis of cold shock proteins. Not all organisms exhibit a lag period of growth phase though. For example, bacteria such as Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacillus lactis do not have a lag stage of cold shock response (8, 115). The cold shock response is elicited in all types of bacteria: psychrophiles and psychrotrophs, mesophiles and thermophiles. It has been extensively studied by using E. coli and B. subtilis as model systems (for reviews, see references 16, 40, 82, 83, 85, 91, 114, and 118). These studies have revealed common features of the bacterial cold shock response. In this chapter, we will mainly focus on the cold shock response of E. coli.
Temperature downshift affects the cell on various levels: (i) decrease in the membrane fluidity; (ii) stabilization of the secondary structures of RNA and DNA; (iii) slow or inefficient protein folding; (iv) reduced ribosome function, affecting translation of non-cold shock proteins; (v) increased negative supercoiling of DNA; and (vi) accumulation of various sugars. Loss of membrane flexibility affects membrane-associated functions such as active transport and protein secretion. In order to adapt to low temperature, bacteria such as E. coli restore the flexibility of membranes by various mechanisms such as increasing the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) with low melting points and high flexibility (homeoviscous adaptation) (106). In E. coli, the UFA produced after temperature downshift is cis-vaccenic acid (cis-11-octadecenic acid). The enzyme β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein (ACP) synthase II converts palmitoleic acid to cis-vaccenic acid. The synthesis of this enzyme is not induced on cold shock, but the enzyme is activated at low temperature (23, 24). Stabilization of secondary structures in nucleic acids leads to impaired transcription and translation due to hindered movement of RNA polymerase or of ribosomes, respectively. Proteins such as CspA homologues act as RNA chaperones to melt the secondary structures in nucleic acids and facilitate cold shock transcription and translation. Increase in the negative supercoiling of DNA caused by temperature downshift affects DNA-related functions, such as replication, transcription, and recombination (57, 70, 112). The effect on transcription is mainly because changes in supercoiling influence the relative orientation of the −35 and −10 regions, which in turn influences recognition of some σ70 promoters by RNA polymerase (112). Certain proteins also undergo changes such as reversible methylation of cytoplasmic signaling/adaptation domains as seen in the case of aspartate chemoreceptor (Tar) of E. coli (80). Folding of some proteins is also affected at low temperature, albeit to a lesser degree than by that by heat shock. As mentioned above, various cold shock proteins produced on temperature downshift help the cells counteract these detrimental changes. Sugars also have been shown to exert protective effect during cold shock response and adaptation.
CspA homologues exhibit functional redundancy.
Cells possess efficient machinery for cold shock induction of CspA homologues.
The cold shock induction of CspA homologues is presumed to be regulated at the levels of mRNA stability, translation, and transcription and does not need additional transcription factors. Significant, albeit transient, stabilization of the cspA mRNA immediately following temperature downshift is mainly responsible for its cold shock induction. The structural element that is responsible for this phenomenon is the untranslated 5' region of cspA mRNA. The half-life of cspA mRNA changes from 12 s at 37°C to >20 min at 15°C (69). Despite a promoter that is active at 37°C, the production of CspA is low at 37°C because of the extreme instability of its mRNA. A constitutive expression of cspA was observed when cspA mRNA was stabilized 150-fold due to a three-base substitution mutation within the 159-base 5'-UTR. This stabilization was found to be at least partially due to resistance against RNase E degradation (18). The second factor that contributes to the cold shock induction of CspA is its efficient translation at temperatures wherein overall transcription machinery is functioning at a suboptimal level. Another structural element in cspA mRNA plays an important role in its cold shock translation, namely the translation-enhancing element (98) located 14 bases downstream of the initiation codon (69, 75). This element is also present in other cold shock-inducible genes such as cspB, cspG, cspI, csdA, and rbfA. Because this sequence is complementary to a region in the penultimate stem of 16S rRNA, it was initially thought to enhance translation initiation by facilitating the formation of the translation preinitiation complex through binding to 16S rRNA; however, this view is now disputed and the exact mechanism of the enhancing effect on translation initiation by this element is unknown at present (69, 75, 98).
CspA homologues have diverse functions.
The secondary structures in RNA stabilized by temperature downshifts affect both transcription elongation and ribosomal movement on RNA and, thus, translation. CspA homologues are induced significantly immediately on temperature downshift and can bind and melt secondary structures in nucleic acids, thereby facilitating transcription and translation at low temperature. Thus CspA homologues have been termed RNA chaperones (3, 47, 88). The relative nonspecificity of binding to nucleic acids (47, 62, 87) enables these proteins to act on a wide range of mRNAs. The RNA chaperone activity also enables these proteins to act as transcription antiterminators at rho-independent terminators (3, 88). This activity is critical for the cold acclimation of cells (88) and seems to be conserved in CspA homologues from higher organisms, for example, wheat Csp protein WCSP1 (76). A similar function has also been shown for cold shock domain proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana (55). Heterologous expression of a cold shock domain protein, CSDP1, or glycine-rich RNA-binding protein, GRP7, from this bacterium complemented the cold-sensitive phenotype of a quadruple csp deletion mutant E. coli.
Recent observations suggest that, in addition to the RNA chaperone function, the CspA homologues have several other cellular roles. This is exemplified by the following observations. CspE has been shown to be involved in camphor resistance and chromosome condensation (37, 102), downregulation of poly(A)-mediated 3' to 5' exonucleolytic decay by PNPase (20), and downregulation of λ Q-mediated transcription antitermination (34), and it has an effect on UV sensitivity (66). The mechanism(s) by which CspE performs these diverse functions is not well defined. CspC and CspE have also been shown to regulate the expression of a number of RpoS-regulated stress proteins such as OsmY (osmotic stress, stationary phase), Dps (osmotic, oxidative stress and stationary phase), ProP (osmotic stress), and KatG (oxidative stress), possibly through regulating RpoS itself. These proteins also regulate expression of the universal stress protein A (UspA), a protein induced in response to numerous stresses (86). CspD, which is induced by starvation and on stationary phase (119) inhibits the initiation and elongation steps of minichromosome replication in vitro, presumably acts as a novel inhibitor of DNA replication and plays a regulatory role in chromosomal replication in nutrient-depleted cells (122). CspA homologues from other bacteria have varied roles. For example, Staphylococcus aureus CspA is involved in the susceptibility of the organism to an antimicrobial peptide derived from human neutrophil cathepsin G (53). The homologue from Lactobacillus plantarum improves adaptation of the organism to cold shock, stationary phase, and freezing stresses (14). A main hypothesis that emerges from these observations is that these proteins may play a more complex role in the stress-response network of cells (86).
Structure of CspA homologues.
As mentioned above, the CspA homologues have functional redundancy and thus are not individually essential for cell growth at low temperature. However, there are certain proteins, deletion of which leads to sensitivity of cells to low temperature. The DEAD-box RNA helicases CsdA and SrmB, RbfA, and PNPase belong to this group of proteins.
The DEAD-box helicases, CsdA and SrmB.
CsdA is a multifunctional, DEAD-box protein that belongs to the large family of putative RNA helicases conserved from bacteria to humans (60). These proteins play important roles in many cellular processes such as processing, transport, or degradation of RNA or ribosome biogenesis (for a review, see reference 41). CsdA is essential only at low temperature, and deletion of its gene impairs growth on cold shock (9, 50). CsdA has multiple cellular functions, such as:
Altogether, these observations suggest that CsdA has multiple overlapping functions in several important physiological processes. It is not clear which, or whether all, of the activities of CsdA play a role in its essential cold shock function, but it appears that its role in RNA decay may be most critical for the cold acclimation of cells.
Both CsdA and SrmB can unwind duplexes with 3' or 5' extensions. Similar to CsdA, overexpression of SrmB stabilizes certain mRNAs (42) and SrmB can also bind to RNase E (54). It has been suggested that CsdA and SrmB assist 50S assembly by modulating RNA structures because their unwinding activity may be required to facilitate structural transitions within the RNA and/or to allow proper binding of r-protein(s). These proteins may act as RNA chaperones that prevent and/or resolve misfolding. For example, rRNA may become trapped in incorrect structures and require assistance to reach its active conformation (35). Despite apparent similar roles, the overexpression of SrmB does not suppress the cold sensitivity of the csdA deletion mutant and vice versa (9). Our recent data show that, in our genetic screen, another DEAD-box RNA helicase, RhlE, can complement the cold-sensitive phenotype of csdA deletion cells. We also observed that, although not detected in our genetic screen, two cold shock-inducible proteins, CspA and an exonuclease, RNase R, can also complement the cold shock function of CsdA. The data suggested that the primary role of CsdA in cold acclimation of cells is in mRNA decay and its helicase activity is pivotal for promoting degradation of mRNAs stabilized at low temperature (2). Interestingly, in B. subtilis, using fluorescent resonance energy transfer (FRET) analysis studies it was shown that the putative cold-induced helicases and the Csps work in conjunction to rescue misfolded mRNA molecules and maintain proper initiation of translation at low temperatures (39).
RbfA.
RbfA is a ribosome-binding factor and was originally identified as a multicopy suppressor of a point mutation in the 5'-end helix of the 16S ribosomal RNA. It was also shown to be associated with the 30S ribosomal subunit (12). These results suggested that RbfA might be involved in the maturation of the 16S ribosomal RNA, and indeed a later study showed it to be required for efficient 16S rRNA processing (7). Deletion of RbfA leads to constitutive cold shock response, and the cells are unable to adapt to low temperature (49). The cold sensitivity of rbfA deletion cells is directly related to their lack of translation initiation-capable 30S subunits containing mature 16S rRNA at low temperature (117).
The three-dimensional structure of RbfA, in which 25 residues have been removed from the carboxyl terminus to make it soluble, was solved by NMR spectroscopy (38). The structure of RbfA from Thermotoga maritima has also been solved (30). The analysis of E. coli RbfADelta25 showed it to contain a α+β fold containing three helices and three β-strands. The structure has type II KH-domain fold topology and is most similar to the KH domain of the E. coli Era GTPase. Its electrostatic field distribution is most similar to the KH1 domain of the NusA protein from T. maritima, another cold shock-associated RNA-binding protein. Structural and functional similarities between RbfA, NusA, and other bacterial type II KH domains suggest that these cold shock-induced proteins may be evolutionarily related.
PNPase.
Expression of PNPase is posttranscriptionally autoregulated at the level of both translation and mRNA stability (45). It binds to the 5' end of the RNase III-processed transcript, leading to inhibition of translation and channeling of pnp mRNA into a degradation pathway (6, 22, 95). This regulation is temporarily relieved during cold acclimation, and the pnp mRNA becomes extremely abundant principally due to stabilization. Transcription antitermination at intercistronic intrinsic terminators also plays a role in transient induction of PNPase (3, 123). Recently, Marchi et al. showed that specific sites in the 5'-untranslated region of pnp mRNA are required for PNPase-sensitive, cold-induced suppression of Rho-dependent transcription termination. Their results suggested that suppression of Rho-dependent transcription termination within pnp and its restoration by PNPase is an autogenous regulatory circuit that modulates pnp expression during the cold acclimation phase (67).
As mentioned above, during the acclimation phase, CspA homologues are highly induced. At the end of the acclimation phase, their synthesis is reduced to new basal levels, while the non-cold shock protein synthesis is resumed, resulting in resumption of cell growth. PNPase was shown to be required to repress production of CspA homologues by degrading them selectively at the end of the acclimation phase. In a pnp mutant, expression of CspA homologues was significantly prolonged upon cold shock (93, 121). PNPase also associates with the endonuclease RNase E and other proteins in the RNA degradosome.
PNPase is a homotrimer of a 711-amino-acid polypeptide, with two RNA-binding domains, KH and S1, located at the C terminus, whereas the duplicated core of the protein is responsible for the catalytic and the homotrimerization properties (25, 99, 108). Systematic structure-function analysis of PNPase domains revealed that both first- and second-core domains are involved in the catalysis of the phosphorolytic reaction and that both phosphorolytic activity and RNA binding are required for autogenous regulation and growth in the cold. Thus, the α-helical domain is involved in PNPase enzymatic activity (6). Recent results also show that the KH and S1 domains of PNPase are important for proper degradosome activity of PNPase at low temperature, at which the stem-loop structures present in the target mRNAs are more stable (68).
Sugars are shown to confer protection to cells undergoing cold shock. DNA microarray analysis of the cold shock response of E. coli cells showed that several genes encoding proteins involved in sugar transport and metabolism are induced by cold shock (84). These sugars transported include maltose, mannose, ribose, xylose, and trehalose. The cold shock induction of sugar transport systems and the accumulation of the sugars themselves are physiologically relevant as cold shock induction of mannose and maltose transport systems was prominently repressed in a cold-sensitive csp quadruple deletion mutant (116) that has a significantly prolonged (4 h) lag period of growth at 15°C as opposed to the normal 1-h lag period of the wild-type strain. On the other hand, trehalose is previously known to confer protection to cells against heat, cold, and osmotic stress by deterring denaturation and aggregation of proteins, by protecting against oxidative damage, and also by stabilizing the cellular membrane (51). Two genes, otsA and otsB, are involved in the synthesis of trehalose, which is increased about eightfold upon temperature downshift. Effects of trehalose deficiency are more marked at 4°C, at which temperature the cell viability is drastically reduced; this can be corrected by the expression of otsA and otsB genes.
Although misfolding of proteins is not as major a problem upon cold shock as in the case of heat shock, recent reports suggest that proper folding and refolding of cold-damaged proteins is important after cold shock (52). DNA microarray analysis of the cold shock response of E. coli showed that certain molecular chaperones, such as caseinolytic proteases (Clps), trigger factor, and GroEL and GroES (84), were induced upon cold shock.
The study of the cold shock response has implications in basic and health-related research as well as in commercial applications. The knowledge accumulated through the study of the cold shock response in E. coli and B. subtilis can be applied to other organisms. For example, it has been observed that exposing cells to cold shock prior to freezing increases cell viability due to the protective effect of cold shock proteins produced (115). This phenomenon can be exploited commercially to increase the shelf life of refrigerated foods by direct freezing, when food-spoilage bacteria are most susceptible to cellular damage, and to increase cold tolerance of bacteria, such as lactic acid bacteria, to minimize economic losses of the commercial fermentations in which these are used (8, 56). In the agriculture industry, better bio-fertilizers are made by using variants of Rhizobium that are better adapted to cold temperatures (11). A desaturase enzyme from a cyanobacterium, known to play an important role in maintaining membrane fluidity after cold shock, has also been shown to confer chilling resistance to tobacco plants (43, 81). Trehalose-producing transgenic rice plants, made by introducing otsA and otsB of E. coli, accumulate trehalose and exhibit increased tolerance to drought, salt, and cold (44).
Studies of the cold shock response have identified several genetic elements that are critical for cold shock adaptation. These include the translation enhancement element, 5' UTRs of cold-inducible genes, and cold shock proteins such as RNA chaperones that have been successfully used to create more efficient protein-synthesizing systems (110). For example, cold shock vectors use some of these novel features to produce proteins or peptides that cannot be produced by using conventional methods. This will be helpful not only for problematic proteins, such as membrane proteins, but also for producing medically important, expensive proteins and peptides in large quantities with little or no purification required (97). Several cold-adapted enzymes have been used in processes that are carried out at low temperature in the presence of biocatalysts. With these recent novel discoveries, the study of the cold shock response is rapidly gaining importance in both basic research and biotechnology.
The cold shock response is elicited by all types of bacteria and affects these bacteria at various levels, such as cell membrane, transcription, translation, and metabolism. Cold shock proteins and certain sugars play a key role in dealing with the initial detrimental effect of cold shock and maintaining the continued growth of the organism at low temperature. Widespread occurrence of CspA homologues in bacteria and the existence of multiple Csps, probably by gene duplication for adaptation to different environmental stresses, suggest that these proteins are important for cell survival. This is also consistent with the suggestion that the CspA family is one of the most ancient protein families (28). Studies of the cold shock response have provided insights into the general principles underlying cellular functions, including those of RNA, membranes, and metabolism. Structural elements critical for the cold shock response and adaptation of bacteria are now being used for biotechnological applications. In addition, cellular processes that occur during the cold shock response are being applied in the food and agriculture industries and in research. Despite recent advances in the study of cold shock response, there are several unanswered questions. It is not known why there is a need for multiple CspA homologues or whether the existence of large numbers of proteins with structurally similar domains is physiologically relevant—for example, the OB fold family proteins that include the CSD proteins as well as the S1 domain proteins. Addressing these questions in future studies should lead to a better understanding of the cold shock response of bacteria.
References
1. Agafonov, D. E., V. A. Kolb, and A. S. Spirin. 2001. Ribosome-associated protein that inhibits translation at the aminoacyl-tRNA binding stage. EMBO Rep. 2:399–402.[PubMed]
2. Awano, N., C. Xu, H. Ke, K. Inoue, M. Inouye, and S. Phadtare. 2007. Complementation analysis of the cold-sensitive phenotype of the Escherichia coli csdA deletion strain. J. Bacteriol. 189:5808–5815.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
3. Bae, W., B. Xia, M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2000. Escherichia coli CspA-family RNA chaperones are transcription antiterminators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7784–7789.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
4. Blaha, G., D. N. Wilson, G. Stoller, G. Fischer, R. Willumeit, and K. H. Nierhaus. 2003. Localization of the trigger factor binding site on the ribosomal 50S subunit. J. Mol. Biol. 326:887–897.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
5. Brandi, A., R. Spurio, C. O. Gualerzi, and C. L. Pon. 1999. Massive presence of the Escherichia coli ‘major cold-shock protein’ CspA under non-stress conditions. EMBO J. 18:1653–1659.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
6. Briani, F., M. Del Favero, R. Capizzuto, C. Consonni, S. Zangrossi, C. Greco, L. De Gioia, P. Tortora, and G. Deho. 2007. Genetic analysis of polynucleotide phosphorylase structure and functions. Biochimie 89:145–157.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
7. Bylund, G. O., L. C. Wipemo, L. A. Lundberg, and P. M. Wikstrom. 1998. RimM and RbfA are essential for efficient processing of 16S rRNA in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180:73–82.[PubMed]
8. Chapot-Chartier, M. P., C. Schouler, A. S. Lepeuple, J. C. Gripon, and M. C. Chopin. 1997. Characterization of cspB, a cold-shock-inducible gene from Lactococcus lactis, and evidence for a family of genes homologous to the Escherichia coli cspA major cold shock gene. J. Bacteriol. 179:5589–5593.[PubMed]
9. Charollais, J., M. Dreyfus, and I. Iost. 2004. CsdA, a cold-shock RNA helicase from Escherichia coli, is involved in the biogenesis of 50S ribosomal subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:2751–2759.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
10. Charollais, J., D. Pflieger, J. Vinh, M. Dreyfus, and I. Iost. 2003. The DEAD-box RNA helicase SrmB is involved in the assembly of 50S ribosomal subunits in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1253–1265.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
11. Cloutier, J., D. Prevost, P. Nadeau, and H. Antoun. 1992. Heat and cold shock protein synthesis in arctic and temperate strains of rhizobia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:2846–2853.[PubMed]
12. Dammel, C. S., and H. F. Noller. 1995. Suppression of a cold-sensitive mutation in 16S rRNA by overexpression of a novel ribosome-binding factor, RbfA. Genes Dev. 9:626–637.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
13. Dersch, P., S. Kneip, and E. Bremer. 1994. The nucleoid-associated DNA-binding protein H-NS is required for the efficient adaptation of Escherichia coli K-12 to a cold environment. Mol. Gen. Genet. 245:255–259.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
14. Derzelle, S., B. Hallet, T. Ferain, J. Delcour, and P. Hols. 2003. Improved adaptation to cold-shock, stationary-phase, and freezing stresses in Lactobacillus plantarum overproducing cold-shock proteins. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:4285–4290.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
15. Donovan, W. P., and S. R. Kushner. 1986. Polynucleotide phosphorylase and ribonuclease II are required for cell viability and mRNA turnover in Escherichia coli K-12. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:120–124.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
16. Ermolenko, D. N., and G. I. Makhatadze. 2002. Bacterial cold-shock proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:1902–1913.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
17. Fang, L., Y. Hou, and M. Inouye. 1998. Role of the cold-box region in the 5' untranslated region of the cspA mRNA in its transient expression at low temperature in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 180:90–95.[PubMed]
18. Fang, L., W. Jiang, W. Bae, and M. Inouye. 1997. Promoter-independent cold-shock induction of cspA and its derepression at 37 degrees C by mRNA stabilization. Mol. Microbiol. 23:355–364.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
19. Feng, W., R. Tejero, D. E. Zimmerman, M. Inouye, and G. T. Montelione. 1998. Solution NMR structure and backbone dynamics of the major cold-shock protein (CspA) from Escherichia coli: evidence for conformational dynamics in the single-stranded RNA-binding site. Biochemistry 37:10881–10896.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
20. Feng, Y., H. Huang, J. Liao, and S. N. Cohen. 2001. Escherichia coli poly(A)-binding proteins that interact with components of degradosomes or impede RNA decay mediated by polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase E. J. Biol. Chem. 276:31651–31656.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
21. Friedman, D. I., E. R. Olson, C. Georgopoulos, K. Tilly, I. Herskowitz, and F. Banuett. 1984. Interactions of bacteriophage and host macromolecules in the growth of bacteriophage lambda. Microbiol. Rev. 48:299–325.[PubMed]
22. Garcia-Mena, J., A. Das, A. Sanchez-Trujillo, C. Portier, and C. Montanez. 1999. A novel mutation in the KH domain of polynucleotide phosphorylase affects autoregulation and mRNA decay in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 33:235–248.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
23. Garwin, J. L., and J. E. Cronan, Jr. 1980. Thermal modulation of fatty acid synthesis in Escherichia coli does not involve de novo enzyme synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 141:1457–1459.[PubMed]
24. Garwin, J. L., A. L. Klages, and J. E. Cronan, Jr. 1980. Beta-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase II of Escherichia coli. Evidence for function in the thermal regulation of fatty acid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 255:3263–3265.[PubMed]
25. Gibson, T. J., J. D. Thompson, and J. Heringa. 1993. The KH domain occurs in a diverse set of RNA-binding proteins that include the antiterminator NusA and is probably involved in binding to nucleic acid. FEBS Lett. 324:361–366.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
26. Goldenberg, D., I. Azar, A. B. Oppenheim, A. Brandi, C. L. Pon, and C. O. Gualerzi. 1997. Role of Escherichia coli cspA promoter sequences and adaptation of translational apparatus in the cold shock response. Mol. Gen. Genet. 256:282–290.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
27. Goldstein, J., N. S. Pollitt, and M. Inouye. 1990. Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:283–287.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
28. Graumann, P., and M. A. Marahiel. 1996. A case of convergent evolution of nucleic acid binding modules. Bioessays 18:309–315.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
29. Graumann, P. L., and M. A. Marahiel. 1998. A superfamily of proteins that contain the cold-shock domain. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:286–290.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
30. Grimm, S. K., and J. Wohnert. 2005. NMR assignments of the cold-shock protein ribosome-binding factor A (RbfA) from Thermotoga maritima. J. Biomol. NMR 31:73–74.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
31. Gualerzi, C. O., A. M. Giuliodori, and C. L. Pon. 2003. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of cold-shock genes. J. Mol. Biol. 331:527–539.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
32. Gualerzi, C. O., and C. L. Pon. 1990. Initiation of mRNA translation in prokaryotes. Biochemistry 29:5881–5889.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
33. Hankins, J. S., C. Zappavigna, A. Prud'homme-Généreux, and G. A. Mackie. 2007. Role of RNA structure and susceptibility to RNase E in the regulation of a cold shock mRNA, cspA mRNA. J. Bacteriol. 189:4353–4358.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
34. Hanna, M. M., and K. Liu. 1998. Nascent RNA in transcription complexes interacts with CspE, a small protein in E. coli implicated in chromatin condensation. J. Mol. Biol. 282:227–239.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
35. Herschlag, D. 1995. RNA chaperones and the RNA folding problem. J. Biol. Chem. 270:20871–20874.[PubMed]
36. Hillier, B. J., H. M. Rodriguez, and L. M. Gregoret. 1998. Coupling protein stability and protein function in Escherichia coli CspA. Fold Des. 3:87–93.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
37. Hu, K. H., E. Liu, K. Dean, M. Gingras, W. DeGraff, and N. J. Trun. 1996. Overproduction of three genes leads to camphor resistance and chromosome condensation in Escherichia coli. Genetics 143:1521–1532.[PubMed]
38. Huang, Y. J., G. V. Swapna, P. K. Rajan, H. Ke, B. Xia, K. Shukla, M. Inouye, and G. T. Montelione. 2003. Solution NMR structure of ribosome-binding factor A (RbfA), a cold-shock adaptation protein from Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 327:521–536.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
39. Hunger, K., C. L. Beckering, F. Wiegeshoff, P. L. Graumann, and M. A. Marahiel. 2006. Cold-induced putative DEAD box RNA helicases CshA and CshB are essential for cold adaptation and interact with cold shock protein B in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 188:240–248.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
40. Inouye, M., and S. Phadtare. 2007. The cold-shock response, p. 180–193. In C. Gerday and N. Glansdorff (ed.), Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
41. Iost, I., and M. Dreyfus. 2006. DEAD-box RNA helicases in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:4189–4197.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
42. Iost, I., and M. Dreyfus. 1994. mRNAs can be stabilized by DEAD-box proteins. Nature 372:193–196.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
43. Ishizaki-Nishizawa, O., T. Fujii, M. Azuma, K. Sekiguchi, N. Murata, T. Ohtani, and T. Toguri. 1996. Low-temperature resistance of higher plants is significantly enhanced by a nonspecific cyanobacterial desaturase. Nat. Biotechnol. 14:1003–1006.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
44. Jang, I. C., S. J. Oh, J. S. Seo, W. B. Choi, S. I. Song, C. H. Kim, Y. S. Kim, H. S. Seo, Y. D. Choi, B. H. Nahm, and J. K. Kim. 2003. Expression of a bifunctional fusion of the Escherichia coli genes for trehalose-6-phosphate synthase and trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase in transgenic rice plants increases trehalose accumulation and abiotic stress tolerance without stunting growth. Plant Physiol. 131:516–524.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
45. Jarrige, A. C., N. Mathy, and C. Portier. 2001. PNPase autocontrols its expression by degrading a double-stranded structure in the pnp mRNA leader. EMBO J. 20:6845–6855.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
46. Jiang, W., L. Fang, and M. Inouye. 1996. The role of the 5'-end untranslated region of the mRNA for CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, in cold-shock adaptation. J. Bacteriol. 178:4919–4925.[PubMed]
47. Jiang, W., Y. Hou, and M. Inouye. 1997. CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 272:196–202.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
48. Jones, P. G., and M. Inouye. 1994. The cold-shock response—a hot topic. Mol. Microbiol. 11:811–818.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
49. Jones, P. G., and M. Inouye. 1996. RbfA, a 30S ribosomal binding factor, is a cold-shock protein whose absence triggers the cold-shock response. Mol. Microbiol. 21:1207–1218.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
50. Jones, P. G., M. Mitta, Y. Kim, W. Jiang, and M. Inouye. 1996. Cold shock induces a major ribosomal-associated protein that unwinds double-stranded RNA in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:76–80.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
51. Kandror, O., A. DeLeon, and A. L. Goldberg. 2002. Trehalose synthesis is induced upon exposure of Escherichia coli to cold and is essential for viability at low temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9727–9732.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
52. Kandror, O., and A. L. Goldberg. 1997. Trigger factor is induced upon cold shock and enhances viability of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4978–4981.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
53. Katzif, S., D. Danavall, S. Bowers, J. T. Balthazar, and W. M. Shafer. 2003. The major cold shock gene, cspA, is involved in the susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus to an antimicrobial peptide of human cathepsin G. Infect. Immun. 71:4304–4312.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
54. Khemici, V., I. Toesca, L. Poljak, N. F. Vanzo, and A. J. Carpousis. 2004. The RNase E of Escherichia coli has at least two binding sites for DEAD-box RNA helicases: functional replacement of RhlB by RhlE. Mol. Microbiol. 54:1422–1430.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
55. Kim, J. S., S. J. Park, K. J. Kwak, Y. O. Kim, J. Y. Kim, J. Song, B. Jang, C. H. Jung, and H. Kang. 2007. Cold shock domain proteins and glycine-rich RNA-binding proteins from Arabidopsis thaliana can promote the cold adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:506–516.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
56. Kim, W. S., and N. W. Dunn. 1997. Identification of a cold shock gene in lactic acid bacteria and the effect of cold shock on cryotolerance. Curr. Microbiol. 35:59–63.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
57. Krispin, O., and R. Allmansberger. 1995. Changes in DNA supertwist as a response of Bacillus subtilis towards different kinds of stress. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 134:129–135.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
58. Lee, S. J., A. Xie, W. Jiang, J. P. Etchegaray, P. G. Jones, and M. Inouye. 1994. Family of the major cold-shock protein, CspA (CS7.4), of Escherichia coli, whose members show a high sequence similarity with the eukaryotic Y-box binding proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 11:833–839.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
59. Lelivelt, M. J., and T. H. Kawula. 1995. Hsc66, an Hsp70 homolog in Escherichia coli, is induced by cold shock but not by heat shock. J. Bacteriol. 177:4900–4907.[PubMed]
60. Linder, P., P. F. Lasko, M. Ashburner, P. Leroy, P. J. Nielsen, K. Nishi, J. Schnier, and P. P. Slonimski. 1989. Birth of the D-E-A-D box. Nature 337:121–122.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
61. Littauer, U. Z. 2005. From polynucleotide phosphorylase to neurobiology. J. Biol. Chem. 280:38889–38897.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
62. Lopez, M. M., K. Yutani, and G. I. Makhatadze. 2001. Interactions of the cold shock protein CspB from Bacillus subtilis with single-stranded DNA. Importance of the T base content and position within the template. J. Biol. Chem. 276:15511–15518.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
63. Lu, J., H. Aoki, and M. C. Ganoza. 1999. Molecular characterization of a prokaryotic translation factor homologous to the eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4A. Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 31:215–229.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
64. Luttinger, A., J. Hahn, and D. Dubnau. 1996. Polynucleotide phosphorylase is necessary for competence development in Bacillus subtilis. Mol. Microbiol. 19:343–356.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
65. Maier, R., B. Eckert, C. Scholz, H. Lilie, and F. X. Schmid. 2003. Interaction of trigger factor with the ribosome. J. Mol. Biol. 326:585–592.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
66. Mangoli, S., V. R. Sanzgiri, and S. K. Mahajan. 2001. A common regulator of cold and radiation response in Escherichia coli. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 20:23–26.[PubMed]
67. Marchi, P., V. Longhi, S. Zangrossi, E. Gaetani, F. Briani, and G. Dehò. 2007. Autogenous regulation of Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase during cold acclimation by transcription termination and antitermination. Mol. Genet. Genomics 278:75–84.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
68. Matus-Ortega, M. E., M. E. Regonesi, A. Pina-Escobedo, P. Tortora, G. Deho, and J. Garcia-Mena. 2007. The KH and S1 domains of Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase are necessary for autoregulation and growth at low temperature. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1769:194–203.[PubMed]
69. Mitta, M., L. Fang, and M. Inouye. 1997. Deletion analysis of cspA of Escherichia coli: requirement of the AT-rich UP element for cspA transcription and the downstream box in the coding region for its cold shock induction. Mol. Microbiol. 26:321–335.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
70. Mizushima, T., K. Kataoka, Y. Ogata, R. Inoue, and K. Sekimizu. 1997. Increase in negative supercoiling of plasmid DNA in Escherichia coli exposed to cold shock. Mol. Microbiol. 23:381–386.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
71. Mohanty, B. K., and S. R. Kushner. 2003. Genomic analysis in Escherichia coli demonstrates differential roles for polynucleotide phosphorylase and RNase II in mRNA abundance and decay. Mol. Microbiol. 50:645–658.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
72. Mohanty, B. K., and S. R. Kushner. 2000. Polynucleotide phosphorylase functions both as a 3' right-arrow 5' exonuclease and a poly(A) polymerase in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:11966–11971.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
73. Mohanty, B. K., and S. R. Kushner. 2000. Polynucleotide phosphorylase, RNase II and RNase E play different roles in the in vivo modulation of polyadenylation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 36:982–994.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
74. Moll, I., S. Grill, A. Grundling, and U. Blasi. 2002. Effects of ribosomal proteins S1, S2 and the DeaD/CsdA DEAD-box helicase on translation of leaderless and canonical mRNAs in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 44:1387–1396.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
75. Moll, I., M. Huber, S. Grill, P. Sairafi, F. Mueller, R. Brimacombe, P. Londei, and U. Blasi. 2001. Evidence against an Interaction between the mRNA downstream box and 16S rRNA in translation initiation. J. Bacteriol. 183:3499–3505.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
76. Nakaminami, K., D. T. Karlson, and R. Imai. 2006. Functional conservation of cold shock domains in bacteria and higher plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:10122–10127.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
77. Nakashima, K., K. Kanamaru, T. Mizuno, and K. Horikoshi. 1996. A novel member of the cspA family of genes that is induced by cold shock in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 178:2994–2997.[PubMed]
78. Newkirk, K., W. Feng, W. Jiang, R. Tejero, S. D. Emerson, M. Inouye, and G. T. Montelione. 1994. Solution NMR structure of the major cold shock protein (CspA) from Escherichia coli: identification of a binding epitope for DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5114–5118.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
79. Nishi, K., F. Morel-Deville, J. W. Hershey, T. Leighton, and J. Schnier. 1988. An eIF-4A-like protein is a suppressor of an Escherichia coli mutant defective in 50S ribosomal subunit assembly. Nature 336:496–498.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
80. Nishiyama, S. I., T. Umemura, T. Nara, M. Homma, and I. Kawagishi. 1999. Conversion of a bacterial warm sensor to a cold sensor by methylation of a single residue in the presence of an attractant. Mol. Microbiol. 32:357–365.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
81. Orlova, I. V., T. S. Serebriiskaya, V. Popov, N. Merkulova, A. M. Nosov, T. I. Trunova, V. D. Tsydendambaev, and D. A. Los. 2003. Transformation of tobacco with a gene for the thermophilic acyl-lipid desaturase enhances the chilling tolerance of plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 44:447–450.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
82. Phadtare, S. 2004. Recent developments in bacterial cold-shock response. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 6:125–136.[PubMed]
83. Phadtare, S., J. Alsina, and M. Inouye. 1999. Cold-shock response and cold-shock proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:175–180.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
84. Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 2004. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the cold shock response in wild-type and cold-sensitive, quadruple-csp-deletion strains of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 186:7007–7014.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
85. Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 2007. Cold-shock proteins, p. 191–210. In R. Margesin, F. Schinner, J.-C. Marx, and C. Gerday (ed.), Psychrophiles: from Biodiversity to Biotechnology. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
86. Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 2001. Role of CspC and CspE in regulation of expression of RpoS and UspA, the stress response proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183:1205–1214.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
87. Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 1999. Sequence-selective interactions with RNA by CspB, CspC and CspE, members of the CspA family of Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 33:1004–1014.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
88. Phadtare, S., M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2002. The nucleic acid melting activity of Escherichia coli CspE is critical for transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277:7239–7245.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
89. Phadtare, S., and K. Severinov. 2005. Extended −10 motif is critical for activity of the cspA promoter but does not contribute to low-temperature transcription. J. Bacteriol. 187:6584–6589.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
90. Phadtare, S., S. Tyagi, M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2002. Three amino acids in Escherichia coli CspE surface-exposed aromatic patch are critical for nucleic acid melting activity leading to transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277:46706–46711.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
91. Phadtare, S., Yamanaka, K., and M. Inouye. 2000. The cold shock response, p. 33–45. In G. Storz and R. Hengge-Aronis (ed.), Bacterial Stress Responses. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
92. Piazza, F., M. Zappone, M. Sana, F. Briani, and G. Deho. 1996. Polynucleotide phosphorylase of Escherichia coli is required for the establishment of bacteriophage P4 immunity. J. Bacteriol. 178:5513–5521.[PubMed]
93. Polissi, A., W. De Laurentis, S. Zangrossi, F. Briani, V. Longhi, G. Pesole, and G. Deho. 2003. Changes in Escherichia coli transcriptome during acclimatization at low temperature. Res. Microbiol. 154:573–580.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
94. Porankiewicz, J., and A. K. Clarke. 1997. Induction of the heat shock protein ClpB affects cold acclimation in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J. Bacteriol. 179:5111–5117.[PubMed]
95. Portier, C., L. Dondon, M. Grunberg-Manago, and P. Regnier. 1987. The first step in the functional inactivation of the Escherichia coli polynucleotide phosphorylase messenger is a ribonuclease III processing at the 5' end. EMBO J. 6:2165–2170.[PubMed]
96. Prud'homme-Genereux, A., R. K. Beran, I. Iost, C. S. Ramey, G. A. Mackie, and R. W. Simons. 2004. Physical and functional interactions among RNase E, polynucleotide phosphorylase and the cold-shock protein, CsdA: evidence for a ‘cold shock degradosome.’ Mol. Microbiol. 54:1409–1421.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
97. Qing, G., L. C. Ma, A. Khorchid, G. V. Swapna, T. K. Mal, M. M. Takayama, B. Xia, S. Phadtare, H. Ke, T. Acton, G. T. Montelione, M. Ikura, and M. Inouye. 2004. Cold-shock induced high-yield protein production in Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:877–882.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
98. Qing, G., B. Xia, and M. Inouye. 2004. Enhancement of translation initiation by A/T-rich sequences downstream of the initiation codon in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 6:133–144. [CrossRef]
99. Regnier, P., M. Grunberg-Manago, and C. Portier. 1987. Nucleotide sequence of the pnp gene of Escherichia coli encoding polynucleotide phosphorylase. Homology of the primary structure of the protein with the RNA-binding domain of ribosomal protein S1. J. Biol. Chem. 262:63–68.[PubMed]
100. Reiner, A. M. 1969. Characterization of polynucleotide phosphorylase mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 97:1437–1443.[PubMed]
101. Reiner, A. M. 1969. Isolation and mapping of polynucleotide phosphorylase mutants of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 97:1431–1436.[PubMed]
102. Sand, O., M. Gingras, N. Beck, C. Hall, and N. Trun. 2003. Phenotypic characterization of overexpression or deletion of the Escherichia coli crcA, cspE and crcB genes. Microbiology 149:2107–2117.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
103. Schindelin, H., W. Jiang, M. Inouye, and U. Heinemann. 1994. Crystal structure of CspA, the major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:5119–5123.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
104. Schindelin, H., M. A. Marahiel, and U. Heinemann. 1993. Universal nucleic acid-binding domain revealed by crystal structure of the B. subtilis major cold-shock protein. Nature 364:164–168.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
105. Schnuchel, A., R. Wiltscheck, M. Czisch, M. Herrler, G. Willimsky, P. Graumann, M. A. Marahiel, and T. A. Holak. 1993. Structure in solution of the major cold-shock protein from Bacillus subtilis. Nature 364:169–171.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
106. Sinensky, M. 1974. Homeoviscous adaptation—a homeostatic process that regulates the viscosity of membrane lipids in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 71:522–525.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
107. Sugino, A., C. L. Peebles, K. N. Kreuzer, and N. R. Cozzarelli. 1977. Mechanism of action of nalidixic acid: purification of Escherichia coli nalA gene product and its relationship to DNA gyrase and a novel nicking-closing enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 74:4767–4771.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
108. Symmons, M. F., G. H. Jones, and B. F. Luisi. 2000. A duplicated fold is the structural basis for polynucleotide phosphorylase catalytic activity, processivity, and regulation. Structure 8:1215–1226.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
109. Toone, W. M., K. E. Rudd, and J. D. Friesen. 1991. deaD, a new Escherichia coli gene encoding a presumed ATP-dependent RNA helicase, can suppress a mutation in rpsB, the gene encoding ribosomal protein S2. J. Bacteriol. 173:3291–3302.[PubMed]
110. Vasina, J. A., and F. Baneyx. 1996. Recombinant protein expression at low temperatures under the transcriptional control of the major Escherichia coli cold shock promoter cspA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:1444–1447.[PubMed]
111. Walker, G. C. 1984. Mutagenesis and inducible responses to deoxyribonucleic acid damage in Escherichia coli. Microbiol. Rev. 48:60–93.[PubMed]
112. Wang, J. Y., and M. Syvanen. 1992. DNA twist as a transcriptional sensor for environmental changes. Mol. Microbiol. 6:1861–1866.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
113. Wang, N., K. Yamanaka, and M. Inouye. 1999. CspI, the ninth member of the CspA family of Escherichia coli, is induced upon cold shock. J. Bacteriol. 181:1603–1609.[PubMed]
114. Weber, M. H., and M. A. Marahiel. 2003. Bacterial cold shock responses. Sci. Prog. 86:9–75.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
115. Willimsky, G., H. Bang, G. Fischer, and M. A. Marahiel. 1992. Characterization of cspB, a Bacillus subtilis inducible cold shock gene affecting cell viability at low temperatures. J. Bacteriol. 174:6326–6335.[PubMed]
116. Xia, B., H. Ke, and M. Inouye. 2001. Acquirement of cold sensitivity by quadruple deletion of the cspA family and its suppression by PNPase S1 domain in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 40:179–188.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
117. Xia, B., H. Ke, U. Shinde, and M. Inouye. 2003. The role of RbfA in 16S rRNA processing and cell growth at low temperature in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 332:575–584.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
118. Yamanaka, K., L. Fang, and M. Inouye. 1998. The CspA family in Escherichia coli: multiple gene duplication for stress adaptation. Mol. Microbiol. 27:247–255.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
119. Yamanaka, K., and M. Inouye. 1997. Growth-phase-dependent expression of cspD, encoding a member of the CspA family in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 179:5126–5130.[PubMed]
120. Yamanaka, K., and M. Inouye. 2001. Induction of CspA, an E. coli major cold-shock protein, upon nutritional upshift at 37 degrees C. Genes Cells 6:279–290.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
121. Yamanaka, K., and M. Inouye. 2001. Selective mRNA degradation by polynucleotide phosphorylase in cold shock adaptation in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183:2808–2816.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
122. Yamanaka, K., W. Zheng, E. Crooke, Y. H. Wang, and M. Inouye. 2001. CspD, a novel DNA replication inhibitor induced during the stationary phase in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 39:1572–1584.[PubMed] [CrossRef]
123. Zangrossi, S., F. Briani, D. Ghisotti, M. E. Regonesi, P. Tortora, and G. Deho. 2000. Transcriptional and post-transcriptional control of polynucleotide phosphorylase during cold acclimation in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 36:1470–1480.[PubMed] [CrossRef]